- From: Sigbjørn Vik <sigbjorn@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:32:39 +0100
- To: public-web-perf@w3.org
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:45:44 +0100, Anderson Quach <Anderson.Quach@microsoft.com> wrote: > AndersonQuach: feedback, we should include: title of tests, description > of tests, objective, and clear pass / fail criteria. > ... would recommend that we pursue self-contained tests until we need a > common infrastructure for testing async behavior and etc. I agree with self-contained, but using the standard harness is also good, as this allows us to integrate the tests into our framework without touching the test itself, we just replace the harness with our own. Not quite sure if that was mentioned. For the same reason, it would be good if tests used relative paths from the root (/resources/testharness.js) instead of absolute paths (http://test.w3.org/resources/testharness.js). -- Sigbjørn Vik Quality Assurance Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 08:33:00 UTC