Re: IOTDB: how granting access to value in a device?

I think it's key that these things don't get baked in at too low a level or
too early. There may be many different security models that people want to
use. If the spec is done well, there'll be flexibility. That's not to say
that you might now want to have a recommended security model, but picking
that will require a lot of hands on experience.

D.

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Da Cruz Pinto, Marcelo <
marcelo.da.cruz.pinto@intel.com> wrote:

>  There are actually a number of ways in which you can negotiate access
> and manage policy for device functionality (sensors and actuators),
> depending of the layer at which you want to establish the control. If we
> consider the scenario in which device functions are exposed via REST APIs
> (regardless on whether the APIs are cloud-hosted or exposed by devices
> directly), the UMA (User-Managed Access) protocol is a very good fit. We
> (Intel) published a small article on how UMA may be mapped to IoT devices
> here:
> https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/Case+Study%3A+IoT+-+Intelligent+Refrigerated+Shipping+Containers
>
>
>
> *From:* Joachim Lindborg [mailto:joachim.lindborg@sust.se]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 2, 2015 1:31 PM
> *To:* public-web-of-.
> *Subject:* IOTDB: how granting access to value in a device?
>
>
>
> How do I grant / block access to specific device values
>
>
>
> one client can read the temperature another can take the picture
>
>
>
> Is it the plan that all devices are fully published on internet? I
> wouldn't like to have my home exposed to internet.
>
>
>
>
>  *Regards*
>
> Joachim Lindborg
> CTO, systems architect
>
>
> Sustainable Innovation  SUST.se
> Barnhusgatan 3 111 23 Stockholm
>
> Email: Joachim.lindborg@sust.se
> linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/joachimlindborg
> Tel +46 706-442270
>