- From: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:46:51 -0700
- To: John Gregg <johnnyg@google.com>
- Cc: Jon Lee <jonlee@apple.com>, public-web-notification@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2012 16:47:21 UTC
Hey John, Same behavior as currently spec wfm. I do not mind just using the word 'id' or 'tag'. Thanks! Doug On Mar 13, 2012, at 9:34 AM, John Gregg wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Jon Lee <jonlee@apple.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The initial discussion based on Safari's feedback looked at one issue, but hasn't looked at the rest. To avoid confusion, I'm splitting out the other outstanding 3 points into separate threads. > > To recap, the original proposal was to replace setReplaceId() with an attribute "id". John Gregg felt "id" suggested uniqueness, which is not true. I felt that "id" was the problem then, and suggested using "tag" to imply this common relationship between notifications. Thoughts? > > Jon > > No objection to changing the name "replaceID" to "tag", but I thought part of your proposal was also concerning the specified behavior of the "tag", i.e., specifying that the UA either in-place update or close and re-open the notification with the same (origin, tag). > > I would prefer to keep that specified behavior.
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2012 16:47:21 UTC