- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:58:36 +0200
- To: "John Gregg" <johnnyg@google.com>
- Cc: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Drew Wilson" <atwilson@google.com>, "Doug Turner" <dougt@dougt.org>, "Web Notification WG" <public-web-notification@w3.org>
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:29:09 +0200, John Gregg <johnnyg@google.com> wrote: > I believe that is generally seen as a shortcoming, not something to be > used as a model, considering > http://www.w3.org/TR/html-bidi/#script-dialog Yeah, my thinking was that Unicode would be sufficient. If that is generally considered too hard to use I suppose having a dir attribute makes sense. I was wondering about something else, how was it decided which attributes are part of the constructor and which are part of the object? dir and replaceId would make a lot of sense on the constructor too. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 12:29:28 UTC