Tuesday, 31 December 2019
- Closed: [web-nfc] NDEFRecordInit#recordType is a required field (#497)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
Monday, 30 December 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] Add creation steps for smart poster, local and external type embedded (#495)
- Re: [web-nfc] NDEFRecordInit#recordType is a required field (#497)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Fix #497: remove unnecessary steps and small fixes
- Re: [web-nfc] NDEFRecordInit#recordType is a required field (#497)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix #488: inconsistency in handling Id and MediaType slots (#496)
- [web-nfc] NDEFRecordInit#recordType is a required field (#497)
- Closed: [web-nfc] scan() should validate NDEFScanOptions#{recordType,mediaType} (#437)
Friday, 27 December 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove NDEFPushOptions ignoreRead (#424)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Inconsistency in handling Id (#488)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix ignoreRead handling (#494)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Fix #488: inconsistency in handling Id and MediaType slots
- Closed: [web-nfc] Writing in which encoding (#476)
- Re: [web-nfc] Writing in which encoding (#476)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove NDEFPushOptions ignoreRead (#424)
- Re: [web-nfc] scan() should validate NDEFScanOptions#{recordType,mediaType} (#437)
Thursday, 26 December 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] What is the correct way to check whether the browser supports Web NFC API or not? (#434)
- Re: [web-nfc] What is the correct way to check whether the browser supports Web NFC API or not? (#434)
- Re: [web-nfc] Add creation steps for smart poster, local and external type embedded (#495)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Add creation steps for smart poster
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Fix ignoreRead handling
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix isLocal algorithm (#493)
Wednesday, 25 December 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] Add isLocal to NDEFRecord and NDEFRecordInit (#491)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Fix isLocal algorithm
- Re: [web-nfc] Add isLocal to NDEFRecord and NDEFRecordInit (#491)
- Re: [web-nfc] Add isLocal to NDEFRecord and NDEFRecordInit (#491)
- Re: [web-nfc] Don't throw exception in 'parse records from bytes' (#490)
Tuesday, 24 December 2019
- Closed: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by beaufortfrancois
- Re: [web-nfc] Add isLocal to NDEFRecord and NDEFRecordInit (#491)
- Re: [web-nfc] Is an empty record type's id null or empty string? (#465)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by beaufortfrancois
- Closed: [web-nfc] Is an empty record type's id null or empty string? (#465)
- Re: [web-nfc] Set empty record id to null (#492)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Set empty record id to null
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Add isLocal to NDEFRecord and NDEFRecordInit
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove NDEFPushOptions ignoreRead (#424)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove NDEFPushOptions ignoreRead (#424)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Don't throw exception in 'parse records from bytes'
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove NDEFPushOptions ignoreRead (#424)
- Re: [web-nfc] Make NDEFRecord.toRecords() nullable (#489)
- Re: [web-nfc] Make NDEFRecord.toRecords() nullable (#489)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove NDEFPushOptions ignoreRead (#424)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
- Closed: [web-nfc] toRecords() should be nullable or not? (#487)
- Re: [web-nfc] Make NDEFRecord.toRecords() nullable (#489)
- Re: [web-nfc] Make NDEFRecord.toRecords() nullable (#489)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Make NDEFRecord.toRecords() nullable
- Re: [web-nfc] Inconsistency in handling Id (#488)
- Re: [web-nfc] toRecords() should be nullable or not? (#487)
- Re: [web-nfc] toRecords() should be nullable or not? (#487)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Filters from multiple readers should be independent (#479)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
- [web-nfc] Inconsistency in handling Id (#488)
- [web-nfc] toRecords() should be nullable or not? (#487)
- Re: [web-nfc] NDEFReader.scan should say when it resolves and returns the promise p (#478)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by beaufortfrancois
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Remove redundant info from scan algorithm
- Re: [web-nfc] NDEFReader.scan should say when it resolves and returns the promise p (#478)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove request to adapters to listen to NDEF messages (#484)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove request to adapters to listen to NDEF messages (#484)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
Monday, 23 December 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove request to adapters to listen to NDEF messages (#484)
- Re: [web-nfc] NDEFReader.scan should say when it resolves and returns the promise p (#478)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by beaufortfrancois
- Re: [web-nfc] Implementation status page (#455)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Add SecureContext to NDEFRecord and NDEFMessage interfaces
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Remove request to adapters to listen to NDEF messages
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by beaufortfrancois
- Re: [web-nfc] Resolve scan promise after reader is activated (#483)
- Re: [web-nfc] NDEFReader.scan should say when it resolves and returns the promise p (#478)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Resolve scan promise after reader is activated
- Re: [web-nfc] permissions-related example in explainer encourages bad assumptions about browser behavior (#482)
Saturday, 21 December 2019
Thursday, 19 December 2019
- [web-nfc] permissions-related example in explainer encourages bad assumptions about browser behavior (#482)
- Re: [web-nfc] NDEFReader.scan should say when it resolves and returns the promise p (#478)
- Re: [web-nfc] NDEFReader.scan should say when it resolves and returns the promise p (#478)
- Re: [web-nfc] scan() should validate NDEFScanOptions#{recordType,mediaType} (#437)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix #479: dispatching NFC content steps (#481)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix #479: dispatching NFC content steps (#481)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Fix #479: dispatching NFC content steps
Wednesday, 18 December 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] What is the correct way to check whether the browser supports Web NFC API or not? (#434)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] What is the correct way to check whether the browser supports Web NFC API or not? (#434)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove NDEFPushOptions ignoreRead (#424)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove NDEFPushOptions ignoreRead (#424)
- Re: [web-nfc] What is the correct way to check whether the browser supports Web NFC API or not? (#434)
- Re: [web-nfc] NDEFReader.scan should say when it resolves and returns the promise p (#478)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Return and resolve promise in reader.scan
- Closed: [web-nfc] The description of multiple scan() calls is a bit vague (#351)
- Re: [web-nfc] The description of multiple scan() calls is a bit vague (#351)
- [web-nfc] Filters from multiple readers should be independent (#479)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Closed: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
Tuesday, 17 December 2019
- [web-nfc] NDEFReader.scan should say when it resolves and returns the promise p (#478)
- Re: Web NFC reaches a key milestone [via Web NFC Community Group]
- Re: [web-nfc] The description of multiple scan() calls is a bit vague (#351)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Link the term domain
- Web NFC reaches a key milestone [via Web NFC Community Group]
Monday, 16 December 2019
- Closed: [web-nfc] Simplify creating external records (#470)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- [web-nfc] Writing in which encoding (#476)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix #470: remove adding effective domain (#474)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Verify security model (#2)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Closed: [web-nfc] SW now has a spec for pattern matching of URLs (#347)
- Re: [web-nfc] local types need some prefix of a kind (#375)
- Re: [web-nfc] Verify security model (#2)
- Re: [web-nfc] SW now has a spec for pattern matching of URLs (#347)
- [web-nfc] Fix embedded message creation steps (#475)
- Re: [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Answer security and privacy questionaire (#457)
- Re: [web-nfc] Answer security and privacy questionaire (#457)
- Re: [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
- Re: [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
Friday, 13 December 2019
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Fix #470: remove adding effective domain
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by beaufortfrancois
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by beaufortfrancois
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Add web-platform tests link to spec
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Add Security and Privacy Questionnaire to README
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Add Security and Privacy Questionnaire
- Re: [web-nfc] Simplify creating external records (#470)
- Re: [web-nfc] Simplify creating external records (#470)
- Re: [web-nfc] Write explainer (#456)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Write explainer (#456)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by beaufortfrancois
- Re: [web-nfc] scan() should validate NDEFScanOptions#{recordType,mediaType} (#437)
- [web-nfc] Simplify creating external records (#470)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Add explainer
- Re: [web-nfc] scan() should validate NDEFScanOptions#{recordType,mediaType} (#437)
- Re: [web-nfc] scan() should validate NDEFScanOptions#{recordType,mediaType} (#437)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: s/smartPosterRecord/externalRecord
Thursday, 12 December 2019
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Update smart-poster example
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Fix typos
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by beaufortfrancois
- Closed: [web-nfc] NDEFRecord.data should return null rather than undefined (#462)
- Re: [web-nfc] Add Han Leon to Acknowledgments section (#464)
- Re: [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Add Han Leon to Acknowledgments section (#464)
- Re: [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by beaufortfrancois
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by beaufortfrancois
- Re: [web-nfc] Is an empty record type's id null or empty string? (#465)
- Re: [web-nfc] s/undefined/null/g for |data| when empty payload (#463)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] s/undefined/null/g for |buffer| when empty payload (#463)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- [web-nfc] Is an empty record type's id null or empty string? (#465)
- Re: [web-nfc] s/undefined/null/g for |buffer| when empty payload (#463)
- Re: [web-nfc] s/undefined/null/g for |buffer| when empty payload (#463)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Add Han Leon to Acknowledgments section
- Re: [web-nfc] s/undefined/null/g for |buffer| when empty payload (#463)
- Re: [web-nfc] s/undefined/null/g for |buffer| when empty payload (#463)
- Re: [web-nfc] s/undefined/null/g for |buffer| when empty payload (#463)
- Re: [web-nfc] s/undefined/null/g for |buffer| when empty payload (#463)
- Re: [web-nfc] s/undefined/null/g for |buffer| when empty payload (#463)
- Re: [web-nfc] NDEFRecord.data should return null rather than undefined (#462)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: s/undefined/null/g for |buffer| when empty payload
- Closed: [web-nfc] 9.10.1 The push() method doesn't mention how record data is verified (#277)
- Re: [web-nfc] NDEFRecord.data should return null rather than undefined (#462)
- [web-nfc] NDEFRecord.data should return null rather than undefined (#462)
- Re: [web-nfc] 9.10.1 The push() method doesn't mention how record data is verified (#277)
Wednesday, 11 December 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] 9.10.1 The push() method doesn't mention how record data is verified (#277)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
- Re: [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Security section (#264)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Security section (#264)
- Re: [web-nfc] Security section (#264)
- Re: [web-nfc] 9.10.1 The push() method doesn't mention how record data is verified (#277)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
- Re: [web-nfc] Create w3c.json (#461)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by anssiko
- Re: [web-nfc] Create w3c.json (#461)
- Re: [web-nfc] Create w3c.json (#461)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Create w3c.json
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix #396: add section for local type record (#451)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix #396: add section for local type record (#451)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix #396: add section for local type record (#451)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix #396: add section for local type record (#451)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix #396: add section for local type record (#451)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix #396: add section for local type record (#451)
- Closed: [web-nfc] We should add a section called "Local type record" - it is missing (#396)
- Closed: [web-nfc] About definition of local type records (#458)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
Monday, 9 December 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
Friday, 6 December 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix #396: add section for local type record (#451)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Disallow id for an empty NDEF record
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
- Re: [web-nfc] Move user activation to obtain permission (#449)
Wednesday, 4 December 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] Tag with 'NFC-A' and 'ISO-DEP' technologies but not recognized as ndef-compatible (#459)
- Re: [web-nfc] Tag with 'NFC-A' and 'ISO-DEP' technologies but not recognized as ndef-compatible (#459)
- Re: [web-nfc] Tag with 'NFC-A' and 'ISO-DEP' technologies but not recognized as ndef-compatible (#459)
- Re: [web-nfc] Tag with 'NFC-A' and 'ISO-DEP' technologies but not recognized as ndef-compatible (#459)
- Re: [web-nfc] Tag with 'NFC-A' and 'ISO-DEP' technologies but not recognized as ndef-compatible (#459)
- [web-nfc] Tag with 'NFC-A' and 'ISO-DEP' technologies but not recognized as ndef-compatible (#459)
Tuesday, 3 December 2019
Monday, 2 December 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] scan() should validate NDEFScanOptions#{recordType,mediaType} (#437)
- Re: [web-nfc] About definition of local type records (#458)
- Re: [web-nfc] Implementation status page (#455)
- Re: [web-nfc] About definition of local type records (#458)
- Re: [web-nfc] Implementation status page (#455)
- Re: [web-nfc] Implementation status page (#455)
- Re: [web-nfc] About definition of local type records (#458)
- [web-nfc] About definition of local type records (#458)