W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-mobile@w3.org > March 2014

Re: [W3C Webmob] IDENTITY: Github repo update

From: Ernesto Jiménez <erjica@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <1395946894193.33832859@Nodemailer>
To: "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: "W3C Webmob Public" <public-web-mobile@w3.org>, "GALINDO Virginie" <virginie.galindo@gemalto.com>, "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, frode.kileng@telenor.com, "Natasha Rooney" <nrooney@gsma.com>, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, "BRYAN L SULLIVAN" <bs3131@att.com>
+1 to Marcos' comment.


In my opinion, the approach Marcos took for installable webapps is the best one: 




1) document how it is approached in current solutions

2) try to quantify how common he different approaches are

3) extract use cases and requirements from what was learnt in steps 1 and 2

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

> On March 26, 2014 at 7:59:00 PM, Natasha Rooney (nrooney@gsma.com) wrote:
>> > Hi all!
>>  
>> I have done some work to the github repo! You can now find ‘use-cases’  
>> and ‘considerations for standards’ in their own files and I have  
>> added a references section for the references I have found (please  
>> add more!).
>> IDENTITY REPO: https://github.com/w3c-webmob/identity/  
>>  
>> Please send pull requests as you see fit, and when we have an update  
>> from the Payments CG (and a report from the Payments Workshop)  
>> we’ll get the next set of actions sorted.
> Thanks for getting this started, Natasha. 
> Some initial reactions... 
> Personally, I would prefer that we don't use hypothetical use cases (as they then to set up unrealistic strawpersons). Identity is a fairly well understood problem - so it should be possible to just look at various mainstream solutions and how they are integrated into various OSs and systems. 
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 19:02:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:59:03 UTC