- From: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:12:06 +0000
- To: Tomomi Imura <tomomi.imura@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-web-mobile@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAF40kP5_d1nb=398td0eW0cRtw3s_9yuwDBmQcX2+sni5DeWSQ@mail.gmail.com>
That's a nice demo Tomomi! /m On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:00 PM, <tomomi.imura@nokia.com> wrote: > > From: ext Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@google.com> > Date: Thursday, February 13, 2014 6:19 AM > To: Tomomi Imura <tomomi.imura@nokia.com> > Cc: "public-web-mobile@w3.org" <public-web-mobile@w3.org> > Subject: Re: RfC: LCWD of Vibration API; deadline March 4 > > Oh and a note regarding use cases. > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:09 PM, <tomomi.imura@nokia.com> wrote: > >> >> I would like to see actually useful use cases besides gaming though. >> > > Form validation is one. Especially on mobile devices, with the software > keyboard being displayed, it is easy to miss visual form validation > messages. Some additional tactile feedback is an easily learned signal. > > > > Michael, I like the idea, so I quickly made a demo! > On Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/86735842 (You need to teun the volume up to > be able to hear the phone vibrates). > Source: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1330446/demo/vibration.html > > It seems to be really a great use case. > I also used the "speech bubble" for the error, which may be an overkill. > The color indication alone with vibrations probably works better. > > Tomomi :-) > > > > > >> tomomi >> >> >> > >> >Thanks! >> > >> >-- >> >Marcos Caceres >> > >> > >> >Forwarded message: >> > >> >> From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> >> >> To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org> >> >> Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 at 5:09:24 PM >> >> Subject: RfC: LCWD of Vibration API; deadline March 4 >> >> >> >> This is a Request for Comments for the Device API WG's February 11 LCWD >> >> of the Vibration API: >> >> >> >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-vibration-20140211/> >> >> >> >> Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback. >> >> >> >> If anyone in WebApps wants to propose an official WG response, please >> >>do >> >> so ASAP, in reply to this e-mail so the WG can discuss it. >> >> >> >> Comments should be sent to public-device-apis @ w3.org (http://w3.org >> ), >> >>with a subject >> >> prefix of [vibration] by March 4. >> >> >> >> -Thanks, AB >> >> >> >> On 2/11/14 12:00 PM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CTO/Boston) wrote: >> >> > The Device API Working Group [1] has published a third Last Call >> >>working draft of the "Vibration API" specification today, 11 February >> >>2014 [2] and requests review comments from your groups (Web Applications >> >>WG, HTML WG). We are also interested in comments from others. >> >> > >> >> > The changes, based on review feedback during CR, are noted in the >> >>status section (with links to diffs) and include allowing >> >>implementations to truncate long vibrations, specifying how concurrent >> >>invocations in different browsing contexts are handled and clarifying >> >>the processing vibration patterns algorithm. >> >> > >> >> > The draft is available at >> >>http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-vibration-20140211/ >> >> > >> >> > The Last Call period ends 4 March 2014 (3 weeks) - please send >> >>comments to the DAP public mailing list with "[vibration]" at the start >> >>of the Subject line. Indications of support for the changes are welcome. >> >> > >> >> > Thanks >> >> > >> >> > regards, Frederick >> >> > >> >> > Frederick Hirsch, Nokia >> >> > Chair, W3C DAP Working Group >> >> > >> >> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/ >> >> > >> >> > [2] http://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/3653 >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 17 February 2014 12:12:34 UTC