Re: Apps Suck! [Was: Re: Mobile, Web and Multi-device]

Hi,

I think the interview  about webApps is very interesting and raise an
important point about linked data-driven apps that cannot be ignored.

http://www.w3.org/blog/2012/07/interview-ora-lassila/

Regards,
Ig


2013/9/26 Satoru Takagi <sa-takagi@kddi.com>

> Hi,
>
> I supplement my personal view for webApps.
>
> > > http://www.w3.org/blog/2012/07/interview-ora-lassila/
> I agree about the part of his awareness of the issues for webApps very
> much of the article.
> However, I cannot find much possibility in the present Semantic Web as the
> solution. On the other hand, I
>  think that the issues should not be left or ignored, and it should be
> solved by evolution of Web
> Browsers (includes web runtime etc.) based on standards. (The evolution
> may have flavor of the Semantic
> Web, but should be accompanied by the simple convenience reinforcement of
> the Web browser.)
> I think such issues to be the important factors of the technology gaps.
>
> Regards,
>
> Satoru Takagi
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > On 9/25/13 4:34 AM, ext Satoru Takagi wrote:
> > > But I can read the opinion like this here.
> > > http://www.w3.org/blog/2012/07/interview-ora-lassila/
> >
> > Thanks Satoru for the reminder of this really nice article and
> > perspective re the Web and apps!
> >
> > _IF_ this group considered `apps suck` as axiomatic and prohibited the
> > use of `mobile`, perhaps all of the [not particularly useful, IMHO ;-)]
> > discussions like "so, what does mobile mean", and "what is a mobile
> > `device`", etc. would be irrelevant and the group could then focus on
> > technology gaps to advance the Web `at large`. Otherwise, it seems like
> > this group is mostly a marketing arm for SysApps and the apps that group
> > is trying to enable.
> >
> > -Cheers, AB
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
[]´s
Ig