- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:17:32 +0100
- To: public-web-mobile@w3.org
On 18/09/2013 16:13, Appelquist Daniel (UK) wrote: > Can this group take up the cause of naming and shaming browser makers who > are not choosing to implement these APIs and thereby hold the Web back? Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I fail to see the point of this group starting a name and shame list...primarily, because I think it would have little to no effect (with all due respect, I don't think the Google Chrome team will shake in their boots if "a W3C group called us out publicly for not implementing this API that we currently have no interest in / we have a better counter proposal / etc). What kind of a signal would that give off anyway? P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2013 15:17:52 UTC