W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-mobile@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Introduction

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:17:32 +0100
Message-ID: <5239C40C.5000603@splintered.co.uk>
To: public-web-mobile@w3.org
On 18/09/2013 16:13, Appelquist Daniel (UK) wrote:
> Can this group take up the cause of naming and shaming browser makers who
> are not choosing to implement these APIs and thereby hold the Web back?

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I fail to see the point of this group 
starting a name and shame list...primarily, because I think it would 
have little to no effect (with all due respect, I don't think the Google 
Chrome team will shake in their boots if "a W3C group called us out 
publicly for not implementing this API that we currently have no 
interest in / we have a better counter proposal / etc). What kind of a 
signal would that give off anyway?

Patrick H. Lauke
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]

www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2013 15:17:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:58:59 UTC