Re: “Resource Priorities” spec

Hi all,

I have been pushing forward the standardization of almost the same function in SVGWG. The use case is selective downloading of tiled map images in Web Mapping.[1] With this use case, this function is required not optional. From such a background, I am pleased with this draft having been published.

[0]:http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Proposals/IFrame_Like_Syntax#5..10_Specifying_whether_external_resources_are_required_for_proper_rendering
[1]:http://www.w3.org/Submission/2011/04/

Regards,

Satoru Takagi

> On Friday, September 6, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >  
> > As part of the work that was done in the “Closing the Gap with native”
> > task force [1], several technical gaps were identified [2], a number of
> > which around the way loading up resources from the network is hard to
> > optimize on the Web.
> >  
> > As such, the recently started work by the Web Performance Working Group
> > on “Resource Priorities” seem pretty relevant:
> > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/ResourcePriorities/Overview.html
> >  
> > (I plan on including it in the next edition of the "mobile web apps
> > standards" doc [3])
> >  
> 
> 
> Note that Hixie said he was going to put lazyload into HTML (or "defer") [x]. I would hold until we have clarity about who is actually going to do that work before you add it.  
> 
> [x] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Apr/0076.html
> 
> 
> 
> --  
> Marcos Caceres
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
高木 悟（Satoru Takagi)
ＫＤＤＩ株式会社 技術開発本部
技術戦略部 サービスフロンティアグループ
Email:sa-takagi@kddi.com

この電子メール及び添付書類は名宛人のための秘密情報を含んで
います。名宛人以外の方が受信された場合は、お手数をお掛けい
たしますが、破棄をお願いいたします。

Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2013 02:02:19 UTC