- From: Mike Kelly <mikekelly321@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:56:49 +0000
- To: public-web-intents@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANqiZJZ18FYkM=uN+5cchhNTbjoP-2-jmXHBYnA8Gn+hWhnAvA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Paul, Ok thanks, that being the case, what is the difference between <link> vs <intent> and @rel vs @action in the following example: <intent action="http://webintents.org/subscribe" type=".." href=".." /> <link rel="http://webintents.org/subscribe" type=".." href=".." /> So, is it possible for web intents to simply re-use the existing, ubiquitous <link> instead of having to introduce <intent>? Cheers, Mike On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Paul Kinlan <paulkinlan@google.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This was something that I started to document under > http://webintents.org/subscribe - the intents discovery mechanism in the > spec doesn't preculde a UA from detecting this and allowing the user to > invoke an action to subscribe to the feed using their preferred application. > > P > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Mike Kelly <mikekelly321@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering whether an example of 'web intent' behaviour has >> already existed for some time: >> >> The example I am thinking of is driven by atom/rss links in the head >> of HTML pages, i.e. an html page containing the following link in the >> head of the document.. >> >> <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" href="...." /> >> >> ... this causes a browser (e.g. Firefox) to present the user with the >> >> option to 'Subscribe to This Page' where the user can fulfil their >> 'subscription intent'. >> >> Would this be considered an equivalent of a web intent? >> >> Cheers, >> Mike >> >> >> > > > -- > Paul Kinlan > Developer Advocate @ Google for Chrome and HTML5 > G+: http://plus.ly/paul.kinlan > t: +447730517944 > tw: @Paul_Kinlan > LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/paulkinlan > Blog: http://paul.kinlan.me > Skype: paul.kinlan > >
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2012 10:18:08 UTC