RE: CFC: Getting rid of 'extras'

James wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
> 
> Any other folks have opinions on the change?

+1 on the change

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 14:36:20 UTC