- From: Paul Kinlan <paulkinlan@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 06:39:46 -0700
- To: Brett Zamir <brettz9@yahoo.com>
- Cc: public-web-intents@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CADGdg3A+HdKNhXLLjSM0V_RyWMS_Pk1mGTvNy-OqRjv0ksAb8A@mail.gmail.com>
We have multiple UX issues with multiple dispatch, for example what happens when 2 serivces are inline dispositions and two are new window dispositions. We have talked about in the past background disposition, but not delved too much intot it. Android has a concept of Broadcast intents that allow 1 or multiple activities to be able to handle the action, but these tend to be managed int the background with no user visible user interface. I think this area is worth exploring, but we need more information and usecases. On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Brett Zamir <brettz9@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 8/23/2012 9:20 PM, Paul Kinlan wrote: > > We have always tried to stay away from this, of seemed like a ux nightmare > and at the time only suited to applications that share content. (If you > have other use cases please let us know) > > If you mean because of the excessive amount of data which could come > through or because the user did not actually want all services shared, I > would think browsers could allow management, even with per site > preferences, by some drag-and-drop or select boxes, so they could specify > services which could be excluded. The UA might even have a dialog which > appeared every time the services were requested (with the ability to click > a checkbox to turn it off), asking for the services to utilize within a > given browser session. I think user experience will depend on the site; it > could be used to implement the like of POP accounts, I think that is pretty > powerful. > > The way we would suggest solving it is for apps like Hootsuite etc to > manage this as they already broadcast to multiple networks. > > > While this might work for some cases, I'm afraid it adds a bit of a > barrier to entry and ties us more to 3rd parties rather than giving us > direct access to our own data. > > Thanks! > Brett > > > On 22 Aug 2012 19:32, "Brett Zamir" <brettz9@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Could a means be added to Web Intents to allow ALL matching registered >> handlers to be executed (with an event to indicate completion)? >> >> I would think one should be able to use such a means to make one's >> application extensible via "plug-ins" whose code could add overlays or >> behaviors (e.g., to allow 3rd parties to add their own context menus to >> one's web app), of course bearing in mind security concerns (as with single >> service usage), or the approach could be used for publish-subscribe, etc. >> >> For example, one might have a third party client app to request Twitter, >> Facebook, Google Mail, etc. (e.g., if the user had set such a preference to >> allow this behavior at these sites), to pass on messages which could be >> shown and handled in a common interface (like POP or IMAP email). >> >> The "persistent connections" approach ( >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/web-intents/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html#persistent-connections) could also enable development of a multi-service chatting application >> with discovery of new services. >> >> Thanks, >> Brett >> >> > -- Paul Kinlan Developer Advocate @ Google for Chrome and HTML5 Watch my I/O talk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1YjdKh-rPg G+: http://plus.ly/paul.kinlan t: +447730517944 tw: @Paul_Kinlan <http://twitter.com/paul_kinlan> LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/paulkinlan Blog: http://paul.kinlan.me Skype: paul.kinlan
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 13:40:17 UTC