- From: Paul Kinlan <paulkinlan@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:53:00 +0000
- To: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-web-intents@w3.org
On http://webintents.org we have defined several basic actions, and it has certainly helped solidify some of the thinking behind the API's and the intended use-case. The point I hope to achieve is that these actions are lightweight enough in nature to not need a massive amount of work speccing out. P On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:46 PM, timeless <timeless@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Paul Kinlan <paulkinlan@google.com> wrote: >>> B. Provider Description Definition For Discovery. > >> I want to ensure that an custom intent tag is not excluded from this >> discussion. We should also scope out areas where discovery is not included >> but provided for, in the case of esoteric devices not considered in this >> scope that might have network discovery mechanisms etc. > > Yes I didn't mean to exclude an <intent> tag, those bits were merely > intended as examples. > >>> E. Basic Actions >>> Probably one per Action (Share, Call, Print, Location, ...). >> >> I would say that we need to define that actions that we want under the scope >> of the working group and thus managed by the spec. > > Well, in the case of DAP, we have Contacts in our Charter, and I > intend to write an Intents based version partially to show that it can > work. > > It could be the case that the TF actually publishes <Zero> Basic > Actions, however, I think not having any sample actions for people to > use as a model isn't a good way to do things. > >> Or we may decided that >> no actions should be included in the spec other than for examples and >> usecases. > > Perhaps we simply point to other groups who publish intents. Note that > I'm raising this item to get opinions about how many and which, not to > dictate the list or anything. > -- Paul Kinlan Developer Advocate @ Google for Chrome and HTML5 G+: http://plus.ly/paul.kinlan t: +447730517944 tw: @Paul_Kinlan LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/paulkinlan Blog: http://paul.kinlan.me Skype: paul.kinlan
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 21:53:33 UTC