- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:35:39 +0900
- To: Paul Kinlan <paulkinlan@google.com>
- Cc: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>, public-web-intents@w3.org
Hi Paul, By "intent tag", you mean the propose <intent> element, right? Is there a reason you believe a new element for this is needed, rather than, say, using the <meta> element? If there's been some discussion about that elsewhere already, and you've explained it, maybe just post a pointer to that discussion here (so we can have it in the mail archive for this group too -- for the next time somebody asks). Maybe that explanation is something that you could add to http://webintents.org/faq.html as well. Paul Kinlan <paulkinlan@google.com>, 2011-11-22 01:23 +0000: > I want to ensure that an custom intent tag is not excluded from this > discussion. We should also scope out areas where discovery is not included > but provided for, in the case of esoteric devices not considered in this > scope that might have network discovery mechanisms etc. -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 01:35:53 UTC