- From: Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:16:37 -0800
- To: WebIntents <public-web-intents@w3.org>
Yes, that's a basic principle of web intents -- it is the user who specifies what service (partner) to use to handle a particular intent. The UA (browser) is expected to be helpful in making this selection seamless and non-irritating, but ultimately the idea is that the user is directly in control of which services handle which intents. On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius <svartman95@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:56:09 -0000, James Hawkins <jhawkins@chromium.org> > wrote: >> >> Can you provide a little more context about where this is coming from, >> Bjartur? >> > Yeah, sorry. I quoted the second message to the ML <4EC7931A.30603@w3.org>. > Also, my use of the term "User Agent" is probably incorrect in this context. > My point is that Users, not Sites, should select Partners. > > > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: >> >> In an application showing the temperature at many locations, presumably >> there is a way for the user to select multiple sensors, and for the >> application to access appropriate metadata for each sensor? In this >> example, the partner (the temperature sensor) wants to provide metadata >> to the site (e.g. its location), and it may be necessary for the user to >> give his/her consent. This points to the need to inform users prior to >> them making a decision as to which partners to use for this particular >> application. > > Selecting a Partner when multiple are registered seems generally useful. > User Agents should thus provide a UI to do so instead of forcing every Site > to redundantly provide a UI ultimately leading to bandwidth waste and > interface incompatibilities. Then users would not need to give up > information, such as the location of their sensors, to the Site. > -- > -,Bjartur >
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 23:17:05 UTC