- From: Bjartur Thorlacius <svartman95@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:04:50 -0000
- To: "James Hawkins" <jhawkins@chromium.org>
- Cc: public-web-intents@w3.org
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:56:09 -0000, James Hawkins <jhawkins@chromium.org> wrote: > Can you provide a little more context about where this is coming from, > Bjartur? > Yeah, sorry. I quoted the second message to the ML <4EC7931A.30603@w3.org>. Also, my use of the term "User Agent" is probably incorrect in this context. My point is that Users, not Sites, should select Partners. Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: > In an application showing the temperature at many locations, presumably > there is a way for the user to select multiple sensors, and for the > application to access appropriate metadata for each sensor? In this > example, the partner (the temperature sensor) wants to provide metadata > to the site (e.g. its location), and it may be necessary for the user to > give his/her consent. This points to the need to inform users prior to > them making a decision as to which partners to use for this particular > application. Selecting a Partner when multiple are registered seems generally useful. User Agents should thus provide a UI to do so instead of forcing every Site to redundantly provide a UI ultimately leading to bandwidth waste and interface incompatibilities. Then users would not need to give up information, such as the location of their sensors, to the Site. -- -,Bjartur
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 22:05:32 UTC