- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:14:26 -0400
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-web-http-desc@w3.org
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 12:25:30PM +0200, Danny Ayers wrote: > On 6/3/05, S. Mike Dierken <mdierken@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >I think the power of automation is with XML. > > > > > > I don't think XML has a monopoly on automation. > > > > There's a big jumble of isolated capabilities from many providers that XML > > can help smooth over and bring into the larger network that is the Web. > > There's much more than that, but it's this broken ground that needs to be > > fixed. > > Sorry for the heresy, but I'd suggest that in general XML, > specifically the profusion of application-specific formats are part of > the problem. To make the Web more joined-up in its services will > require more than low-level syntax conventions (they're useful, but > nothing like sufficient). You know I agree with you Danny, but let's not go there; we know how that debate ends. I think it's quite reasonable to say that the description language should support both XML and non-XML resource representations, as well as supporting XML-specific features like namespace dispatching (RDF Forms does this) or XML schemas (though I hope we can avoid that, as mentioned). Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Friday, 3 June 2005 13:14:03 UTC