- From: Jan Algermissen <jalgermissen@topicmapping.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:26:59 +0200
- To: Jan Algermissen <jalgermissen@topicmapping.com>
- Cc: public-web-http-desc@w3.org
On Jun 1, 2005, at 9:41 PM, Jan Algermissen wrote: > and each allowed transition is a combination of HTTP method and a > definition of what may > be sent as a message body (aka form) Mark, I have allways wanted to ask you what you would think about adding a means to express 'accepted RDF schemas' to RDF forms but also felt that that was somehow missing the point. I just realized that I would actually need some way of specifying accepted RDF graphs (e.g. via patterns[1]) to use RDF forms for what I have in mind. What are your feelings about such an addition? Jan [1] and with a way to say allow-to-add-this or allow-to-delete-this ________________________________________________________________________ ____________________ Jan Algermissen, Consultant & Programmer http://jalgermissen.com Tugboat Consulting, 'Applying Web technology to enterprise IT' http://www.tugboat.de
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2005 20:27:04 UTC