- From: Mark Vickers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 21:12:01 +0000
- To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
@nigelmegitt & @chrisn , I'm not trying to argue for or against the phrase "timed metadata". I'm really making an editorial comment about being consistent with PR #49. After PR #49 is applied: - There are now 31 references to the new phrase "timed metadata", while only 2 remain of "media timed events" (in the title and in section 4.6). - "timed metadata" is defined twice, in Section 1 & 2, while "media timed events" is completely undefined, even in the context of the one usage in 4.6. - The document summary in Section 1. Introduction is now all about "timed metadata". So, my point is that it makes no sense to title the document with a phrase which is undefined, unused in the document (save once) and unmentioned in the summary introduction. Now, if there's a better replacement for "timed metadata", that's a different, perfectly reasonable discussion. I just don't see the point of keeping the doc named with a phrase that has been essentially eliminated from the doc in PR #49. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mavgit Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/me-media-timed-events/pull/49#issuecomment-499257450 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2019 21:12:04 UTC