- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 04:23:53 +0900
- To: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
available at: https://www.w3.org/2017/03/08-webtv-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks, Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Web&TV IG - Cloud Browser TF 08 Mar 2017 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2017/03/08-webtv-irc Attendees Present Alexandra, Chris, Colin, Kaz Regrets Chair Alexandra Scribe kaz Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Welcome Chris! 2. [5]Accessibility portion on the cloud browser TF wiki 3. [6]Architecture Note draft * [7]Summary of Action Items * [8]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ <scribe> scribenick: kaz welcome Chris! am: welcome, Chris! ... we're publishing an IG note for the CB architecture ... not a big document ... high level cloud browser description <alexandra-mikityuk> [9]https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_T F/groupnote [9] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/groupnote co: accessibility officer from AMI am: tx <chris> thanks you - happy to be here am: we can talk about accessibility part and the detail of the IG Note [10]Cloud Browser Architecture draft on the wiki [10] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/groupnote am: (explains the draft) ... discussion on the interface between the CB and the client ... maybe Colin also can introduce himself? cm: (explains his work) ... focusing on set-top-box <chris> ok am: explaining the draft would be helpful cm: we're working on the draft architecture document ... single stream approach and double stream approach ... how to make them accessible may be interesting to you ... set-top-box just provides media stream ... plugin assistive technology may be used ... there is a gap with accessibility co: actual UI is handled by the Cloud Browser Client? cm: yes ... key inputs like mouse events are transferred to the Cloud Browser Server ... both the single stream approach and the double stream approach are cloud browsers Accessibility portion on the cloud browser TF wiki am: if I go to the wiki page of the TF ... there are use case descriptions as well <alexandra-mikityuk> [11]https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_ TF/UseCases [11] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/UseCases am: there is a section for accessibility ... which includes resources provided by John ... we can provide some more wiki resources as well <colin> [12]https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_ TF/Introduction_cloud_browser [12] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/Introduction_cloud_browser cm: the above wiki also includes accessibility section Architecture Note draft am: let's go back to the Architecture note draft ... Colin has started to move the content to GitHub cm: currently generating the draft HTML on my private GitHub repo ka: can create a repo under the W3C area ... let's wrap up the IG Call for Consensus first ... then talk with Mark about where/how to put the draft for publication ... and after getting his OK, copy Colin's draft to the IG github area cm: what about Editors/Acknowledgements? ka: Editors are those who edited the wiki and/or the HTML ... Authors are those who provided concrete text for the draft ... we can include all the people who provided ideas (on the ML and/or during the call) cm: we can visit the TF participants list and include them in the Acknowledgements section ... who should be included in the ack section of the architecture doc? ... Nilo, Kaz, Steve, Oliver ... will add the above people for the first version Note am: question on the structure of the doc cm: this initial version was automatically generated ... can change the structure if needed kaz: the structure should be same as the wiki version because the group review was done based on the wiki version cm: will fix the structure ... and will send it to the repo location kaz: repeats the proposed procedure: ... let's wrap up the IG Call for Consensus first ... then talk with Mark about where/how to put the draft for publication ... and after getting his OK, copy Colin's draft to the IG github area cm: sounds like a plan am: btw, we used capital letter for the section titles, e.g., "Client Device" ... so let's follow that notation ... ok ... let's continue the edit, wrap up the group approval and talk with Mark about the next step ... let's check the progress at the next meeting in two weeks (March 22) kaz: ok ... btw, the IG charter runs out the end of April, and we need extension ... will talk with Mark am: ok ... questions? (none) kaz: please note the daylight savings in US and EU ... will mention that point when I send the minutes out to the group [ adjourned ] Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [13]scribe.perl version 1.152 ([14]CVS log) $Date: 2017/03/08 19:19:01 $ [13] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2017 19:25:09 UTC