- From: Vickers, Mark <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:31:43 +0000
- To: "Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <glenn.deen@nbcuni.com>
- CC: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>, "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C05699CB-A8DC-4199-8EAD-22BAC6FADEB3@cable.comcast.com>
I’m personally fine using only the built-in history and changes mechanisms that Giuseppe describes below, because: 1. It’s consistent across all W3C wikis. 2. It’s automatic - no chance of forgetting to list a change. 3. It’s less work. 4. It meets my personal needs. However, I have no objection if the group wants to add a changes section. Thanks, mav On Mar 12, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal) <glenn.deen@nbcuni.com<mailto:glenn.deen@nbcuni.com>> wrote: What do people think about adding a “Changes” section to the use case template where editors can jot a Date + who + explanation of the change they did. That will allow readers to know there was at least a change , who did it and when. For example: Changes * 3/11/15 – glenn deen – added Author field to use case template If there aren’t objections, I’ll add this to our template. -glenn From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com<mailto:giuseppep@opera.com>> Date: Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 12:41 AM To: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org<mailto:public-web-and-tv@w3.org>" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org<mailto:public-web-and-tv@w3.org>> Subject: [GGIE] Use cases and changes Resent-From: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org<mailto:public-web-and-tv@w3.org>" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org<mailto:public-web-and-tv@w3.org>> Resent-Date: Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 12:42 AM On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org<mailto:ashimura@w3.org>> wrote: Use case template NiloM: Suggests changes to the use case template. <kaz> [9]Use Case wiki [9] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/GGIE_TF/UseCases kaz: wiki system does have feature to track changes. ... perhaps we can assign a specific author and reviewer to each use case. <inserted> [ fyi, the old use case template of the main IG had fields on "submitter" and "reviewer": [10]http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/New_Ideas ] [10] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/New_Ideas glenndeen: will think about the best way to manage updates to wiki. Suggests we have a discussion on the mailing list. kaz: maybe users can use different colors when making edits. <NiloM> color is better than nothing. At least it would show what changed. Not sure if the built in wiki features are useful enough, but just for the record: - there is a "view history" section in each wiki page (reachable via a top-right tab/button) where one can select two versions of the page an see the changes. - logged in people can also subscribe to changes, so each time the document changes you get an email. - changes can also be shared on the list with a link like this https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/index.php?title=GGIE_TF%2FUseCases&diff=3652&oldid=3651 /g
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 20:32:28 UTC