Re: Shared Motion - multi-device synchronization and media control for the Web.

Dear IG Members


The Multi-device Timing group is created.

http://www.w3.org/community/webtiming/

and we have started with a little demo in the first blog post

http://www.w3.org/community/webtiming/2015/02/05/welcome-multi-device-timing/

We will be using the mail list public-webtiming@w3.org so you are welcome
to listen in on that (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webtiming/),
or even better to join the group.


Best, Ingar




2015-02-03 11:50 GMT+01:00 Ingar Mæhlum Arntzen <ingar.arntzen@gmail.com>:

> Dear IG Members.
>
> Following up your kind recommendations we have proposed a community group
> related to the Shared Motion proposal discussed in this thread.
>
> Please have a look a the charter and support its creation if you deem it
> relevant.
>
> Note particularly the section "Importance" in the charter, which is
> focused on use cases for the broadcast industry - and mentions some use
> cases already discussed in this IG.
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/blog/2015/02/03/proposed-group-multi-device-timing-community-group/
>
> PS. We have not yet provided any outline of API's protocols etc, as
> requested earlier by Giuseppe, but intend to start this work once the CG
> has received necessary support.
>
> Best,
>
> Ingar and Njål
>
>
> 2015-01-23 10:01 GMT+01:00 Ingar Mæhlum Arntzen <ingar.arntzen@gmail.com>:
>
>>
>> Ah, sorry Guiseppe about the name blunder.
>>
>> Will get back to you on spec outlines.
>>
>> Ingar
>>
>> 2015-01-23 9:54 GMT+01:00 Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Ingar Mæhlum Arntzen <
>>> ingar.arntzen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Pascale
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Giuseppe ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> We will shortly go ahead and suggest a Community Group with goals
>>>> reflecting your recommendations here.
>>>>
>>>> We will get back to the IG for comments once we have a draft for the
>>>> charter.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Great, thanks. Please also keep this group informed from time to time on
>>> the progress made on the spec drafting.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> /g
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Ingar
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-01-20 13:51 GMT+01:00 Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Given that use cases and requirements have been discussed more then
>>>>> enough in this group, I would say go ahead drafting a initial proposal of
>>>>> such extension spec (to HTML5) would look like and we could gather feedback
>>>>> on that.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the first round of comments we probably don't need an accurate
>>>>> spec but something simpler which highlight the main concept of a "future"
>>>>> spec.
>>>>>
>>>>> I need to point out that this group is not chartered to work on
>>>>> technical specifications, so I think starting a CG could be the best option
>>>>> to move this forward, unless other people have a better suggestions.
>>>>>
>>>>> As you know, CG don't need any official approval, so you can just go
>>>>> ahead and create one, and inform this group (and others) about it so that
>>>>> anyone interested can join.
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> /g
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>