- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:15:16 +1100
- To: Daniel Davis <ddavis@w3.org>
- Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHp8n2m=qW02Lx5PKjfoyALqPhvLatSZ_SJq1tz6+uWzUkDYZA@mail.gmail.com>
BTW: the audio data of a video element can very well be accessed using the web audio api. You might want to do some new experiments with that. Also, may I suggest sending this assessment to the HTML WG list and/or the WHATWG list such that the implementers will actually see your results? I don't believe they would be subscribed to this mailing list. Best Regards, Silvia. On 7 Nov 2014 09:06, "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > Nice to get an updated state of implementations. I did one 5 years ago in > my "definitive guide to html5" book. As I was writing the book and came > avoids differences in implementations, I registered bugs on the browsers > (at least those that had public bug trackers). Many things improved since. > Can I suggest you register bugs on the respective browsers, too? That would > really help the community! > > Best Regards, > Silvia. > On 6 Nov 2014 13:35, "Daniel Davis" <ddavis@w3.org> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> It was good to see so many of you at our TPAC meeting last week. >> >> Here is something I thought should be shared - a technical paper on web >> video by three German researchers. It's an independent assessment of >> HTML5 video support focussing on event mechanisms and seeking accuracy: >> >> "A Comparative Evaluation of Current HTML5 Web Video Implementations" >> http://www.ronpub.com/publications/OJWT-v1i2n01_Hoernig.pdf >> >> It's good to see a peer-reviewed openly-available academic paper on this >> subject and I hope there will be more, leading to greater shared >> knowledge. >> >> With regards, >> Daniel Davis >> W3C >> >> >> >>
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2014 22:15:42 UTC