- From: Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié <jicheu@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:26:21 +0200
- To: "Futasz, Alexander" <alexander.futasz@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- CC: "HU, BIN" <bh526r@att.com>, "Web and TV Interest Group (public-web-and-tv@w3.org)" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Futasz, Alexander wrote: >> > HbbTV is*not* developing its own specs (HbbTV does not define specs, it >> > gathers technologies and orchestrate them). And it's too late for HbbTV >> > v2 anyway:( >> > > > While it might be too late for that, it would good to have them as part of the CG if they are interested. I've reached out to a colleague to try and contact them. It will be great to see people from HbbTV to participate. We are actually a few already wearing the two hats. >> > However, we need to consider feedback from the HbbTV Steering >> > committee >> > during the web and tv workshop in Munich: if we want this to get wide >> > adoption we'll need to provide a comprehensive coverage of what other >> > specs provide. No one's going to switch to a spec with less capabilities. >> > >> > I would like to propose as a starter that the group declares that: >> > * it will gather existing specs (using liaison if necessary, is it >> > possible in a CG?) and summarize them in the feature/api matrix the way >> > the Media API TF did >> > * Orchestrate this result as a clear requirement for a future WG >> > > > I like the proposal. We can start with the parts from the DAE spec from OIPF/HbbTV that are related to this. Hold on until people agree on this :) JC
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2014 12:26:52 UTC