- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:39:52 +0900
- To: "Bassbouss, Louay" <louay.bassbouss@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- CC: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
On 09/05/2013 12:05 AM, Bassbouss, Louay wrote: > Dear all, > > Attached is a nice graphic illustrating the flow of UC12 "Multiscreen > Advertisement" we discussed in the PhC :). > > @Kazuyuki: can you please correct “HbbTV 2.4” to “HbbTV 2.0” in the > minutes. fixed. Thanks! Kazuzyuki > > Best regards, > > | Dipl.-Ing. Louay Bassbouss > > | Project Manager > > | Future Applications and Media > > | > > | Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems > > | Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 31 | 10589 Berlin | Germany > > | Phone 49 30 - 3463 - 7275 > > | louay.bassbouss@fokus.fraunhofer.de > > | www.fokus.fraunhofer.de <http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de> > > --- > > Visit us at IFA, Berlin, September 6-11, 2013 > > Hall 11.1, booth 21 > > Discover the newest products at the world’s leading trade show for > consumer electronics and home appliances. > > IFA is the most important trade event. > > www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/go/ifa2013_en > <http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/go/ifa2013_en> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kazuyuki Ashimura [mailto:ashimura@w3.org] > Sent: Mittwoch, 4. September 2013 16:46 > To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org > Subject: [apis] minutes - 4 September 2013 > > available at: > > http://www.w3.org/2013/09/04-webtv-minutes.html > > Also as text below. > > Thanks a lot for taking these minutes, Mark! > > Kazuyuki > > --- > > [1]W3C > > [1] http://www.w3.org/ > > - DRAFT - > > Web and TV Interest Group - Media APIs TF Teleconference > > 04 Sep 2013 > > [2]Agenda > > [2] > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-and-tv/2013Sep/0002.html > > See also: [3]IRC log > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2013/09/04-webtv-irc > > Attendees > > Present > > Kaz, Bin, Sheau, Daniel, Giri, Olivier, MarkV, Igarashi, > > Sung_Hei, Louay, Cyril > > Regrets > > Chair > > Olivier > > Scribe > > Mark_Vickers > > Contents > > * [4]Topics > > 1. [5]Roll Call > > 2. [6]Review Open Action Items > > http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/products/7 > > 3. [7]Review and discuss the list of use cases (last call > > per schedule) > > 4. [8]review of Use Case Twelve - Multiscreen > > Advertisement > > 5. [9]Review and discuss the requirements > > * [10]Summary of Action Items > > __________________________________________________________ > > Roll Call > > giri: introduces himself. > > olivier: Have bridge for 90 min, may not use 90. > > Review Open Action Items > > [11]http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/products/7 > > [11] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/products/7 > > olivier: 2 open action items. both on giuseppe, who isn't on > > the call today. > > sheau: giuseppe says he's still working on his action items. > > Review and discuss the list of use cases (last call per schedule) > > <olivier> > > [12]http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs#Iterations_and > > _Timeline > > [12] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs#Iterations_and_Timeline > > <olivier> > > [13]http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/Use_Cases > > [13] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/Use_Cases > > olivier: Today is deadline for final review of use cases. > > ... First: Any additional use cases or any use cases to be > > deleted from the list? > > ... Work still going on on last two use cases. > > ... Please focus on new use case 12. > > <olivier> Mark_Vickers: multi-screen advertisement is a large > > topic, could almost be the focus on a single group > > mark_vickers: the topic of multiscreen advertisement is very > > large. > > olivier: we will work on those 12 use cases. > > sheau: question on the next step: what do we want to do with > > the mapping onto requirements? > > olivier: What I would like to do today is to speak about use > > case 12, then review the mapping table, then discuss how to do > > the gap analysis. > > <olivier> [Louay introduces himself] > > louay: introduces himself. main topic at Fraunhofer is > > multiscreen. > > review of Use Case Twelve - Multiscreen Advertisement > > louay: Use case 12 is related to recent work at Fraunhofer. > > ... Idea behind use case is more or le ad insertion with second > > screen advertisement related to content on the main screen. > > ... There are many relevant technologies. In our prototype, we > > used Bonjour discovery of Android devices, TV connected to > > proxy which performed discovery, communication with WebSockets > > olivier: Is Mark suggesting we split the use case? > > <olivier> Mark_Vickers: ad insertion could be done on 1st > > screen > > mav: Not suggesting whether to split, just that it is a large > > topic. > > <gmandyam> Had two questions: (1) Is multiscreen ads part of > > the HbbTV 2.0 work?, (2) Should this UC be generalized > > multiscreen rendering? > > louay: Regarding hbbtv, in hbbtv 2.4 there is a lot of > > discussion of multiple devices. > > ... the prototype isn't related to any hbbtv spec. > > ... the communication used in the prototype is new, but the > > topic has been discussed in hbbtv. > > ... As to the technology, the technology used for connecting > > the screens could be used for any multiscreen use cases. > > sheau: This is indeed a large use case. More than half of other > > existing use cases could be folded into this one (e.g. > > discovery & synchronization). Could we have a hierarchy of use > > cases with large use case and sub-use cases? > > olivier: There's no rule on large vs. sub use cases. I'm > > hearing that this use case is large. Should we split it into > > multiple use cases? > > ... Any thought on how to split it? > > sheau: We could group the use cases into groups. One group > > would be synchronized multiscreen, the other would be ads > > starting and ending at same time without synchrony, third would > > be users interacting with ads > > bin: instead of splitting into multiple use cases, ask louay > > whether there are any additional requirements from this use > > case, since the end goal is gap analysis. This might be easier. > > alivier: Following that. Sheau, would you say everything is > > covered? > > sheau: I agree with bin that at this point we have covered the > > space pretty well. We should use use case 12 to guide our > > search for requirements. > > olivier: Sheau, please review use case 12 for any additional > > requirements. > > <olivier> Mark_Vickers: for some networks there would be a > > requirement that messaging for ad insertion can not be used for > > ad elimination > > cyril: The OATC group is addressing these issues in a spec > > delivering metadata to the client. > > ... The OATC has a spec. There will soon be a new spec defining > > a stream of metadata to the client. Avoiding ad elimination > > could be tricky. > > sheau: I'd like to expand further that this is not limited to > > ads. We should provide more signaling, to avoid ads or segments > > being messed up. We need to provide guidance as to what can be > > modified. Need to add semantics to signals. > > olivier: I suggest we move to next agenda item to review the > > grid. > > Review and discuss the requirements > > <olivier> > > [14]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvACjV6qSvmxdE > > ctdjYwa2JOalZLOG10elE1LVRZNlE#gid=0 > > [14] > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvACjV6qSvmxdEctdjYwa2JOalZLOG10elE1LVRZNlE#gid=0 > > olivier: Want to review two contentious items, then review new > > use case 12. > > ... 1st contentious area: > > sheau: want to make sure we provide function of parental > > control. For example, when I say "content protection" I mean > > that when a child browses content, some content would be > > eliminated from display. > > olivier: Sounds like we agree we can remove the X > > ... Next item was use case 9 & content streaming, which > > actually wasn't contentious on reconsideration, so not an issue > > ... Reviewing use case 12 > > ... This use case about device discovery, not service discovery > > <olivier> [15]http://www.w3.org/TR/hnreq/ > > [15] http://www.w3.org/TR/hnreq/ > > sheau: While it seems the same, it is reverse: Service > > discovery vs. device discovery. > > <olivier> ACTION: Sheau to split the first requirement to be > > "service discovery" and "device discovery" in the requirements > > document and cross-ref table [recorded in > > [16]http://www.w3.org/2013/09/04-webtv-minutes.html#action01] > > <trackbot> Created ACTION-140 - Split the first requirement to > > be "service discovery" and "device discovery" in the > > requirements document and cross-ref table [on Sheau Ng - due > > 2013-09-11]. > > <olivier> > > [17]http://www.w3.org/TR/hnreq/#discovery-and-advertising > > [17] http://www.w3.org/TR/hnreq/#discovery-and-advertising > > olivier: Suggests sheau use the HN Requirements document for > > semantics > > kaz: W3C MMI architecture has defined semantic architecture > > that could be used here. > > [18]http://www.w3.org/TR/mmi-arch/ > > [18] http://www.w3.org/TR/mmi-arch/ > > olivier: [Continues editing list of requirements for use case > > 12] > > ... questions use case 12 requirement for 1.5.1 device > > authentication. > > sheau: user identification needed > > olivier: that would be 1.5.3 subscriber authentication > > sheau: there are cases where number of devices are limited > > olivier: OK, we'll leave 1.5.1 device authentication > > ... [Continues editing list of requirements for use case 12] > > ... There is no cross on 1.8 Context-based and targeted service > > aggregation. Believe ther should be one. Hearing no objections, > > it is added. > > ... Any need for 1.11 Offline mode for services and content > > sheau: recorded content would be 1.11 > > olivier: added cross for 1.11 > > ... 1.12 device-to-device content transfer, is there any > > content transfer or just communication? > > louay: there is app to app communication. it could include > > content or content could be referenced in communication and > > pulled from a third party. > > sheau: one scenario is that the broadcast could include > > different versions of ad content and then the main device could > > serve that content to the mobile device > > igarashi: I'd also like to discuss use case 8 before end of the > > call. > > olivier: let's try to wrap us use case 12 quickly > > ... we'll keep cross on 1.12 > > ... 1.13 payment mechanism definitely in scope > > ... 1.14 search - agree not in scenario > > ... 1.15 & 1.16 also not in scenario > > ... I believe that 1.17 channel identification chould be added. > > Any agree? [no replies] Not added. > > ... [Continues editing list of requirements for use case 12] > > olivier completes review of use case 12 requirements in table. > > olivier: Group should work offline on whether there are > > additional requirements from use case 12 to be reviewed next > > week. > > ... If there are any questions on requirements, please add to > > table using color red and adding a question mark "?" > > igarashi: offline mode is necessary for Use Case 8: download > > and go > > ... requirement 1.12 device-to-device content transfer is > > required for use case 8 also > > <olivier> > > [19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-and-tv/2013J > > ul/0050.html > > [19] > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-and-tv/2013Jul/0050.html > > igarashi: Suggest adding adding further description for content > > protection requirement to include offline content protection. > > olivier: Suggest rewording the requirement offline on the list. > > <gmandyam> UC 8: Is network selection (e.g. optimum network for > > download) in scope? > > giri: Is network selection also in scope for use case 8? > > <olivier> ACTION: gmandyam to add requirement for network > > selection (relevant to UC8) [recorded in > > [20]http://www.w3.org/2013/09/04-webtv-minutes.html#action02] > > <trackbot> Created ACTION-141 - Add requirement for network > > selection (relevant to uc8) [on Giridhar Mandyam - due > > 2013-09-11]. > > olivier: next teleconference is in 2 weeks. we'll send agenda. > > thanks to all. apologies for running over time. meeting > > adjourned. > > <kaz> [ adjourned ] > > Summary of Action Items > > [NEW] ACTION: gmandyam to add requirement for network selection > > (relevant to UC8) [recorded in > > [21]http://www.w3.org/2013/09/04-webtv-minutes.html#action02] > > [NEW] ACTION: Sheau to split the first requirement to be > > "service discovery" and "device discovery" in the requirements > > document and cross-ref table [recorded in > > [22]http://www.w3.org/2013/09/04-webtv-minutes.html#action01] > > [End of minutes] > > __________________________________________________________ > > Minutes formatted by David Booth's [23]scribe.perl version > > 1.138 ([24]CVS log) > > $Date: 2013-09-04 14:44:33 $ > > [23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm > > [24] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ > > -- > > Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Web&TV, MMI and Voice > > Tel: +81 466 49 1170 > -- Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Web&TV, MMI and Voice Tel: +81 466 49 1170
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2013 08:40:43 UTC