- From: Ng, Sheau (NBCUniversal) <Sheau.Ng@nbcuni.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 23:49:14 +0000
- To: Clarke Stevens <c.stevens@cablelabs.com>, "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 23:49:53 UTC
Clarke, I apologize for not attending yesterday's meeting due to unavoidable schedule conflict I meant to seek clarification on my action point to combine the two use cases that I submitted previously. Was the intent of the group that I combine the two browser sync use cases (Issue 67 and Issue 69) and re-submit as a new use case, or simply ignore one, and modify the other existing one to incorporate text from the second use case? webtv-ISSUE-67: Synchronization Across Browsers http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/issues/67 webtv-ISSUE-69: Switching of streams across browsers http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/issues/69 Secondly, was there a conclusion when last discussed by the group that both use cases are appropriate and once combined into a single use case, would be considered "approved" by the group? Once I have answers to these two, I will take action accordingly. Thanks! -- Sheau Ng | NBCUniversal | P: +1.609.759.0819
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 23:49:53 UTC