Hi Daniel At today’s call, we decided to postpone the discussion regarding your proposal to next week call to give you a chance to defend your opinion :) My comments: On 4Dec 2013, at 06:58, Daniel Davis <ddavis@w3.org> wrote: > > 6. Device Authentication Mechanism > > Authentication is not in scope for the NSD spec. This is probably better > handled with Web Crypto or others. > Agree. Actually, It’s not in Web Crypto neither (see today’s minutes and Giri’s comment in the spreadsheet) > 7. Local Access Control > > As discussed at TPAC, the requirement itself needs more refinement > before determining how in-scope this is. > Re-reading the requirement [1], it looks to me like something which can go very deep and spawn to various WG. So as a second thought, I’m not sure a simple refinement of the requirement would really help. It also relates to Local Network Service Protection [2] . May be a specific discussion should be triggered on this topic? A wider discussion which could encompass that one is about protection on tv as a general topic: device authentication, app authentication, content access (remote and local). > 17. Tuner Control > > Tuner Control, or something similar, is likely to need its own spec or > API so is not part of NSD. Moving this forward is being discussed > separately. Agreed. A CG spawn on this specific subject is under discussion :) [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/Requirements#Local_Access_Control [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/Requirements#Local_Network_Service_Protection_Mechanism Regards JCReceived on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 15:15:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:57:20 UTC