W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-and-tv@w3.org > August 2013

RE: [apis] Use Case 12 - Multiscreen Advertisement

From: Bassbouss, Louay <louay.bassbouss@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:21:49 +0000
To: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
CC: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3958197A5E3C084AB60E2718FE0723D453A38BF6@FEYNMAN.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Dear all,



I submitted yesterday a new UC "Multiscreen advertisement"<http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/Use_Cases#12._.22Use_Case_Twelve_.E2.80.93_Multiscreen_Advertisement.22> . I think a new "Eventing Mechanism" between Broadcasting service and Applications  is needed for this UC. Below is the description of this Req.:



Eventing Mechanism

There SHALL be a mechanism for applications to subscribe to stream events of a TV Broadcasting service. Example: Application  will be notified when a commercial break starts or ends.  Broadcasting service MAY also sends limited amount of data in the event e.g. Ad ID or product ID.

Derived From
  Use Case Twelve<http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/Use_Cases#12._.22Use_Case_Twelve_.E2.80.93_Multiscreen_Advertisement.22> - Multiscreen Advertisement

Do you think this is covered in other requirements?
Best regards,
Louay



-----Original Message-----
From: Olivier Thereaux [mailto:Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk]
Sent: Mittwoch, 28. August 2013 14:50
To: Bassbouss, Louay
Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
Subject: Re: [apis] Use Case 12 - Multiscreen Advertisement



Louay,



On 28 Aug 2013, at 13:45, Bassbouss, Louay wrote:



> Hello Olivier, are the requirements in the UC-Req-Xref document fix or can I add new requirement(s).





The requirements in the UC-Req table are all the ones listed and described in:

http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/Requirements



You should feel free to propose and draft additional requirements, of course. I would suggest sending them to the list first, as I reckon Giuseppe is in the process of moving the requirements document somewhere else and you wouldn't want to have an addition lost in the move.



Olivier
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 13:22:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:57:17 UTC