Re: [apis] UC9 and Content Streaming requirement

On 22 Aug 2013, at 21:48, "Ng, Sheau (NBCUniversal)" <> wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm puzzled why UC9 (9 9. "Use Case Nine  Watch and Record") does not have the Content Streaming as requirement. I couldn't find any discussion on this in the minute. I've added a "X?" on the Requirement doc entry, hoping to have a discussion in a future meeting.

Thanks for the addition Sheau. Sounds like an obvious X. 

It is probably just something we overlooked - we mostly reviewed the controversial marks in the document. I encourage all to do a full review to spot other possible cases of overlooking an obvious/interesting match.

I would, however, not worry too much about making sure the use cases / requirements cross table is perfect. The goal here is to get a sense of whether all requirements are valid and important, and derive more requirements if needed. The hard (and useful) part will be the gap analysis, starting soon.


Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2013 12:42:29 UTC