Re: [profile] Profile spec title

+1 to "Web Media Profile"

Kazuyuki


On 03/08/2012 03:55 PM, John Simmons wrote:
> +1
>
> Please excuse brevity. Sent from a mobile device.
>
> John C. Simmons | Media Platform Architect | Microsoft Corporation |
> direct 425-707-2911 | mobile 425-269-5759
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Vickers, Mark
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 6:35 PM
> To: Dewa, Yoshiharu (OSAKI)
> Cc: Glenn Adams; Giuseppe Pascale; public-web-and-tv@w3.org; GAUSMAN, PAUL
> Subject: Re: [profile] Profile spec title
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 5:39 PM, "Dewa, Yoshiharu (OSAKI)"
> <Yoshiharu.Dewa@jp.sony.com <mailto:Yoshiharu.Dewa@jp.sony.com>> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Rgs,
>>
>> -- Yoshiharu
>>
>> *From:*Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:34 AM
>> *To:* Giuseppe Pascale
>> *Cc:* public-web-and-tv@w3.org <mailto:public-web-and-tv@w3.org>;
>> GAUSMAN, PAUL
>> *Subject:* Re: [profile] Profile spec title
>>
>> I was going to suggest something like this, but glad it has been
>> proposed. I would suggest capitalizing Profile also, i.e., "Web Media
>> Profile".
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com
>> <mailto:giuseppep@opera.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:50:42 +0100, GAUSMAN, PAUL <pg2483@att.com
>> <mailto:pg2483@att.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Why not:
>>
>> "Web Media profile"
>> Guidelines for integration of interactive media services in a
>> browser-based environment
>>
>> ...and point out the video stuff within the document structure.
>>
>> Sounds good to me as well. Anybody disagree?
>>
>> /g
>>
>>     Thanks!
>>     -Paul
>>
>>     Q me
>>
>>
>>
>>     -----Original Message-----
>>     From: Giuseppe Pascale [mailto:giuseppep@opera.com
>>     <mailto:giuseppep@opera.com>]
>>     Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 3:00 AM
>>     To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org <mailto:public-web-and-tv@w3.org>;
>>     david.corvoysier@orange.com <mailto:david.corvoysier@orange.com>;
>>     Robin Berjon
>>     Subject: Re: [profile] Profile spec title
>>
>>     I'm not convinced about the world "platform", it seems to imply a
>>     lot more
>>     than what we are aiming too.
>>     And since guidelines it seems to be used in W3C for a type of
>>     documents
>>     that is different from our document I'll than propose to stick to
>>     "profile".
>>
>>     Even though I agree with Robin that profile tend to generate bad
>>     feelings,
>>     at the end of the day a profile is what we are doing.
>>     And anyway I hope people will not judge the book from its cover.
>>
>>     Finally, as a more generic alternative for TV I can propose media.
>>
>>     So the title would be
>>
>>     "Web Media profile"
>>     Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a
>>     browser-based environment
>>
>>     If nobody disagree I'll use this. Hopefully we can have more
>>     discussions
>>     on other topics ;)
>>
>>     /g
>>
>>     On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:27:47 +0100, <david.corvoysier@orange.com
>>     <mailto:david.corvoysier@orange.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     I wouldn't argue too much on the exact wording unless it explicitly
>>     states that the scope of the document is reduced to "resource-limited
>>     devices", which is exactly what I want to avoid: the whole point
>>     of the
>>     document is to improve interoperability, not to create yet another
>>     target for service providers ...
>>
>>     That said, the following Robin+giuseppe remix would suit me:
>>
>>     "Web and TV platform"
>>     Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a
>>     browser-based environment
>>
>>     David
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Giuseppe Pascale
>> TV & Connected Devices
>> Opera Software
>>


-- 
Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Web&TV, MMI and Voice
Tel: +81 466 49 1170

Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 10:05:43 UTC