RE: [profile] Profile spec title

+1

 

 

best regards / Grüße

        Stephan Steglich

 

10th European Interactive TV Conference - EUROITV 2012

July 4-6, 2012, http://www.euroitv2012.org <http://www.euroitv2012.org/> 

 

 

From: John Simmons [mailto:johnsim@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 7:56 AM
To: Vickers, Mark; Dewa, Yoshiharu (OSAKI)
Cc: Glenn Adams; Giuseppe Pascale; public-web-and-tv@w3.org; GAUSMAN, PAUL
Subject: RE: [profile] Profile spec title

 

+1

Please excuse brevity. Sent from a mobile device.

John C. Simmons | Media Platform Architect | Microsoft Corporation | direct 425-707-2911 | mobile 425-269-5759

________________________________

From: Vickers, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 6:35 PM
To: Dewa, Yoshiharu (OSAKI)
Cc: Glenn Adams; Giuseppe Pascale; public-web-and-tv@w3.org; GAUSMAN, PAUL
Subject: Re: [profile] Profile spec title

+1




On Mar 7, 2012, at 5:39 PM, "Dewa, Yoshiharu (OSAKI)" <Yoshiharu.Dewa@jp.sony.com> wrote:

	+1 

	 

	Rgs,

	-- Yoshiharu

	 

	 

	From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com] 
	Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:34 AM
	To: Giuseppe Pascale
	Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org; GAUSMAN, PAUL
	Subject: Re: [profile] Profile spec title

	 

	I was going to suggest something like this, but glad it has been proposed. I would suggest capitalizing Profile also, i.e., "Web Media Profile".

	On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote:

	On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:50:42 +0100, GAUSMAN, PAUL <pg2483@att.com> wrote:

	Why not:
	
	"Web Media profile"
	Guidelines for integration of interactive media services in a
	browser-based environment
	
	...and point out the video stuff within the document structure.

	Sounds good to me as well. Anybody disagree?
	
	/g

		 

		Thanks!
		-Paul
		
		Q me
		
		
		
		-----Original Message-----
		From: Giuseppe Pascale [mailto:giuseppep@opera.com]
		Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 3:00 AM
		To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org; david.corvoysier@orange.com; Robin Berjon
		Subject: Re: [profile] Profile spec title
		
		I'm not convinced about the world "platform", it seems to imply a lot more
		than what we are aiming too.
		And since guidelines it seems to be used in W3C for a type of documents
		that is different from our document I'll than propose to stick to
		"profile".
		
		Even though I agree with Robin that profile tend to generate bad feelings,
		at the end of the day a profile is what we are doing.
		And anyway I hope people will not judge the book from its cover.
		
		Finally, as a more generic alternative for TV I can propose media.
		
		So the title would be
		
		"Web Media profile"
		Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a
		browser-based environment
		
		If nobody disagree I'll use this. Hopefully we can have more discussions
		on other topics ;)
		
		/g
		
		On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:27:47 +0100, <david.corvoysier@orange.com> wrote:

		I wouldn't argue too much on the exact wording unless it explicitly
		states that the scope of the document is reduced to "resource-limited
		devices", which is exactly what I want to avoid: the whole point of the
		document is to improve interoperability, not to create yet another
		target for service providers ...
		
		That said, the following Robin+giuseppe remix would suit me:
		
		"Web and TV platform"
		Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a
		browser-based environment
		
		David

		 

	
	
	-- 
	Giuseppe Pascale
	TV & Connected Devices
	Opera Software