- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:39:53 +0900
- To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
available at: http://www.w3.org/2012/01/05-webtv-minutes.html also as text below. Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - MPTF call 05 Jan 2012 [2]Agenda [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/Agenda_Telco_5th_January_2012 See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2012/01/05-webtv-irc Attendees Present Clarke, Graham, Kazuyuki, Eric, John, Duncan, Jason, MarkW, Bryan, Franck, David, Narm, Dave_Mays Regrets Chair Clarke Scribe Kaz Contents * [4]Topics * [5]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ clarke: thanks for all your discussion and great effort ... my first question is ... based on what we submitted ... how to follow-up? ... not sure about the traditional ways ... but reasonable to keep the current TF? ... or something else? kaz: several possible options ... including (1) extend MPTF or (2) create new TF for HTML comments, profile, etc. clarke: we need to determine which issues to handle ... consensus on defining option 3 on adaptive bit rate ... should we do that within this MPTF or need a new TF? ... also content protection ... and profiling ... how to deal with those three topics? ... any opinion? markW: there is already an approach of Webkit patch clarke: you propose a TF? markW: that's just a source code repository clarke: various options to handle that... markW: would suggest we should consider inplementation <dcorvoysier> Actually it's a bit more than just code john: before anything is provided, prototyping is needed <dcorvoysier> [6]http://html5-mediasource-api.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/draft-spec/ mediasource-draft-spec.html [6] http://html5-mediasource-api.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/draft-spec/mediasource-draft-spec.html clarke: prototyping jason: happy to work for prototyping clarke: sounds like good way to proceed ... MPTF goes for prototyping ... good approach for option 3 ... what about content protection? jason: what does "creating a TF" mean? clarke: need a new charter, different call slot, etc. ... want to avoid unnecessarily procedure jason: agree bryan: agree clarke: so we'd suggest we'll extend MPTF ... and discuss prototyping, content protection, etc. ... that would be most sufficient ... in that case, what should we do? ... maybe we need to create a new charter kaz: ok ... in that case, we should copy the current charter and create an updated one ... mentioning the new topics clarke: ok dave_mays: btw, any feedback from HTML-WG? clarke: just a usual one saying it's now on the queue ... regarding the next week ... we'll have the CE Show ... who would not be available? dave: not available clarke: we can host the call from Las Vegas next week ... any link on prototyping? david: API is on Webkit bug (looking for the actual link) <dcorvoysier> This is the original post on the whatwg mailing-list [7]http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-July/032 384.html [7] http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-July/032384.html <mark> [8]https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64731 [8] https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64731 <Clarke> Thanks, Kaz <jasonlewis> thank for the links. <jasonlewis> happy new year folks Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [9]scribe.perl version 1.136 ([10]CVS log) $Date: 2012/01/05 16:34:44 $ [9] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [10] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 16:40:57 UTC