- From: Clarke Stevens <C.Stevens@CableLabs.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:47:28 -0700
- To: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
I apologize for getting this out so late. I'm at CES and have been quite busy, but I do plan to have the call on Thursday. Here's the proposed agenda for the MPTF meeting: http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/Agenda_Telco_5th_January_2012 Here's the meeting information: http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/Telco Also, here is a message from Phillipp with some background for one of our agenda topics. ----- There's an important deadline on Jan 14 wrt the bugs the TF submitted and the HTML5 endgame timeline http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0315.html The relevant parts are === (15.5 weeks) [FLEX] - December 31, 2011 - all bugs remaining in LC1 components addressed by editors Consequences of missing this date: bugs still open past this date can be escalated to Tracker Issues immediately if the originator so chooses. (2 weeks) - Jan 14, 2012 - cutoff for escalating bugs for Last Call consideration - all Tracker Issues in Tracker, calls for proposal issued by this date Consequences of missing this date: any further escalations will not be treated as a Last Call comment. === Given that not all bugs were addressed by editors on December 31, the TF now needs to look at " bugs still open past this date can be escalated to Tracker Issues immediately if the originator so chooses. " So whatever bugs the TF thinks are important to treat as last call comments should be chosen and escalated *before Jan 14*. Note that "officially", escalating bugs triggers some complex mechanism of "call for proposals" and "counterproposals" in the WG, whereas actual discussion stops - from experience, this is somewhat inefficient and leads to delays. We would would recommend to you to continue the discussion despite the escalation (and will also encourage the edtitor to continue the discussion, and to try to resolve bugs even if escalated. Let us know if you have any questions or need further clarification. -Philipp ----- Thanks, -Clarke
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 07:52:49 UTC