- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:39:34 -0800
- To: "Mandel, Bill (NBCUniversal)" <bill.mandel@nbcuni.com>
- Cc: "Vickers, Mark" <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>, Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>, olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr, public-web-and-tv@w3.org, geunkim@mw2.or.kr, "Ng, Sheau (NBCUniversal)" <Sheau.Ng@nbcuni.com>
The group may also wish to consider the Content Recognition Metadata specification (http://www.movielabs.com/crmd/), which specifies XML-based structures for the delivery of descriptive metadata to content recognition entities. A couple of use cases are provided. I have added it to the list on the wiki. Best, -- Pierre On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Mandel, Bill (NBCUniversal) <bill.mandel@nbcuni.com> wrote: > We are using metadata standards more and more wrt content distribution. You > may find these sources useful: > > > > Base Level Metadata (MovieLabs) > > This deals with all the base level descriptive metadata so that a digital > product can be fully described. > > http://www.movielabs.com/md/md/index.html > > > > The Entertainment Merchants Association has derived a profile from that > specific to digital movie and TV episodic retail: (EMA Core 1.0) > > http://www.entmerch.org/programsinitiatives/the-ema-metadata-structure > > > > Other are adopting or harmonizing from these: > > Ultraviolet: (in the metadata specs) > > On this page look for “Technical Specifications” > > http://uvvu.com/uv-for-business.php > > > > Indirectly more metadata is available via web api’s from EIDR: > > http://eidr.org/technology/ > > > > This may all be tangential but at least indicates some typical uses of > metadata which might be referred to by applications and users. > > > > Regards, > > Bill Mandel > > > > > > From: Vickers, Mark [mailto:Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com] > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 9:12 AM > To: Daniel Park > Cc: olivier Thereaux; <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr>; > <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>; <geunkim@mw2.or.kr>; Ng, Sheau (NBCUniversal) > Subject: Re: [metadata] New Content Metadata and Synchronization Task Force > > > > Another existing work which should be considered is embedded metadata. For > example, there are a lot of Microdata schemas relevant to Web & TV IG at > schema.org: > > - http://schema.org/TVSeries > > - http://schema.org/TVSeason > > - http://schema.org/TVEpisode > > - http://schema.org/Movie > > - http://schema.org/MusicRecording > > - http://schema.org/MediaObject > > - http://schema.org/ImageObject > > - http://schema.org/VideoObject > > - http://schema.org/AudioObject > > - http://schema.org/MusicVideoObject > > - http://schema.org/Rating > > - http://schema.org/TelevisionStation > > - http://schema.org/RadioStation > > - http://schema.org/MovieTheater > > - etc. > > > > Thanks, > > mav > > > > On Nov 26, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all. > > As I mentioned at the previous f2f, this metadata tf is able to refer to the > relevant wg as http://www.w3.org/2008/01/media-annotations-wg.html. > > Over 3 years, we researched on the metadata issues widely. > > Regards. > > Soohong Daniel Park, Ph.D. > Samsung Electronics. SWC > > 2012. 11. 27. 오전 1:27에 "olivier Thereaux" <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>님이 작성: > > Dear Web&TV IG participants, > > As you will have read in Giuseppe's announcement earlier today, a number of > new task forces are being created to take on the exciting work which we > mapped during the recent meeting at TPAC. > > I would like to kick off the one which we called Content Metadata and > Synchronization TF. It will aim to produce scenarios and technical > requirements related to exposing media metadata to the web stack and > synchronising media, events and interactions. > > The task force has its home page on the group's wiki: > http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Metadata > and I invite you to join. > > > Among the next steps, let me suggest: > > * Could people interested in participating in this task force add their name > to the list? > > * Can you review the section currently titled "Our approach"? > > As you can see in the current draft for that section, I suggest we start by > gathering scenarios and use cases. We can start from a number of sources: > the work done by the HNTF (see if there are any scenario with gaps in the > metadata/sync area) and the presentations given at TPAC. Sheau, Jean-Claude > and Geun-Hyung, maybe you could get that work started by extracting > scenarios from your TPAC presentations? > > > Obviously, we are aware that content metadata and synchronisation are > technical solutions and we should be careful about considering reasonably > broad scenarios before jumping to technical requirements. I expect some of > our scenarios will influence the work done in other task forces, and vice > versa. > > Any other thought? > Let's get started. > > Best, > Olivier > >
Received on Monday, 10 December 2012 19:40:38 UTC