RE: [[HOME_NETWORK_TF] Priority of Application Communications

Hi Giuseppe,

I am happy with it, too. Thank you .

PS. See you in Hollywood.

-***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***--***---***---***-
Tatsuya Igarashi (Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com)
NS Development Dept. Technology Development Group 
Sony Corporation
(Voice) +81-3-5435-3252 (Fax) +81-3-5435-3274




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Hammond [mailto:matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 1:37 AM
> To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org; Igarashi, Tatsuya; Giuseppe Pascale
> Subject: Re: [[HOME_NETWORK_TF] Priority of Application Communications
> 
> Hi Giuseppe, apologies for the delay in replying. I'm happy with the
> changes you have made.
> 
> Many thanks
> 
> 
> Matt
> 
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:24:49 +0100, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > I've done an attempt to rephrase this section to avoid misunderstanding
> > on the importance of direct communication requirements.
> > Igarashi, Matt, all, could you check if you think the new text is fine?
> >
> >
> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/index.php?title=HNTF/Home_Network_TF

> _Requirements&diff=1211&oldid=1210
> >
> > /g
> >
> > On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 11:21:11 +0200, Giuseppe Pascale
> > <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:23:48 +0200, Matt Hammond
> >> <matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Igarashi,
> >>>
> >>> I agree that these requirements enable a wide range of applications.
> I
> >>> would certainly hope that these requirements be discussed at the next
> >>> stage. I also have an interest in enabling these kinds of applications.
> >>>
> >>> My concern would be that we could end up with nearly all our
> >>> requirements
> >>> labelled "high priority". Will this make it difficult for Working
> >>> Groups
> >>> to determine what subsets they can usefully tackle?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I have the same concern. Note also that if a WG decide to take an
> >> approach that deals with both requirements in one solution than you
> >> basically do not have this problem.
> >> On the other and if the technical discussion ends up requiring 2
> >> different solutions the question would then be: is more important to
> >> deal with existing devices or with a completely new approach?
> >>
> >>
> >>> I would not mind if they are reclassified as "high priority" if there
> >>> is a
> >>> way we can still assist WGs in that decision process. Would it be
> >>> sufficient to group them and frame them with some explanation - perhaps
> >>> based on your words below?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Should I do an attempt to remove the word "High priority" and "Low
> >> priority" (that could be misleading) and just replace it with groups
> of
> >> requirements with some explanation of their "different way of being
> >> important" ?
> >>
> >> /g
> >>> regards
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Matt
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 09:40:42 +0100, Igarashi, Tatsuya
> >>> <Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> As I commented in the last teleconference, I think that the
> >>>> requirement
> >>>> of Application Communications should be high priority.
> >>>>
> >>>> I believe that it is important for the Web echo system to take in
> >>>> account of Application Communication via home network as well as
> >>>> Service
> >>>> Communication. As nobody denies, the HTML5 in wide sense is not just
> a
> >>>> presentation language, but also a application platform. If the W3C
> >>>> standardizes a solution that an application discovers and communicates
> >>>> services running on other devices on the home network. The solution
> >>>> should also consider the case of the communication with applications
> >>>> running on other devices. I think the direct link communications via
> >>>> home network can leverage the web technologies and will create new
> >>>> types
> >>>> of application which mashes up Web and home networked devices.
> >>>>
> >>>> Actually I have a concern that only service discovery and service
> >>>> communication will be discussed at next step due to the priority.
> >>>> Since
> >>>> both use cases are similar, I suggest that WG will discuss a technical
> >>>> solutions by taking in count of both of requirements in the same
> >>>> priority. The approach will avoid the solutions will differ
> >>>> completely.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have realize that the a set of requirements should be high priority.
> >>>>
> >>>> #Application
> >>>>
> communication<http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_R

> equirements#Application_communication>,#Application
> >>>>
> Discovery<http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Requi

> rements#Application_Discovery>,
> >>>> #Services
> >>>>
> Advertisement<http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_R

> equirements#Services_Advertisement>,
> >>>>
> >>>> Any question and comment?
> >>>> Thank you.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> -***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***--***---***---***-
> >>>> Tatsuya
> >>>> Igarashi
> (Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com<mailto:Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com>)
> >>>> NS Development Dept. Technology Development Group
> >>>> Sony Corporation
> >>>> (Voice) +81-3-5435-3252 (Fax) +81-3-5435-3274
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> | Matt Hammond
> | Research Engineer, BBC R&D, Centre House, London
> | http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/

Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 00:06:01 UTC