Re: [[HOME_NETWORK_TF] Priority of Application Communications

Hi Giuseppe, apologies for the delay in replying. I'm happy with the  
changes you have made.

Many thanks


Matt

On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:24:49 +0100, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>  
wrote:

> I've done an attempt to rephrase this section to avoid misunderstanding  
> on the importance of direct communication requirements.
> Igarashi, Matt, all, could you check if you think the new text is fine?
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/index.php?title=HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Requirements&diff=1211&oldid=1210
>
> /g
>
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 11:21:11 +0200, Giuseppe Pascale  
> <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:23:48 +0200, Matt Hammond  
>> <matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Igarashi,
>>>
>>> I agree that these requirements enable a wide range of applications. I
>>> would certainly hope that these requirements be discussed at the next
>>> stage. I also have an interest in enabling these kinds of applications.
>>>
>>> My concern would be that we could end up with nearly all our  
>>> requirements
>>> labelled "high priority". Will this make it difficult for Working  
>>> Groups
>>> to determine what subsets they can usefully tackle?
>>>
>>
>> I have the same concern. Note also that if a WG decide to take an  
>> approach that deals with both requirements in one solution than you  
>> basically do not have this problem.
>> On the other and if the technical discussion ends up requiring 2  
>> different solutions the question would then be: is more important to  
>> deal with existing devices or with a completely new approach?
>>
>>
>>> I would not mind if they are reclassified as "high priority" if there  
>>> is a
>>> way we can still assist WGs in that decision process. Would it be
>>> sufficient to group them and frame them with some explanation - perhaps
>>> based on your words below?
>>>
>>>
>> Should I do an attempt to remove the word "High priority" and "Low  
>> priority" (that could be misleading) and just replace it with groups of  
>> requirements with some explanation of their "different way of being  
>> important" ?
>>
>> /g
>>> regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 09:40:42 +0100, Igarashi, Tatsuya
>>> <Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> As I commented in the last teleconference, I think that the  
>>>> requirement
>>>> of Application Communications should be high priority.
>>>>
>>>> I believe that it is important for the Web echo system to take in
>>>> account of Application Communication via home network as well as  
>>>> Service
>>>> Communication. As nobody denies, the HTML5 in wide sense is not just a
>>>> presentation language, but also a application platform. If the W3C
>>>> standardizes a solution that an application discovers and communicates
>>>> services running on other devices on the home network. The solution
>>>> should also consider the case of the communication with applications
>>>> running on other devices. I think the direct link communications via
>>>> home network can leverage the web technologies and will create new  
>>>> types
>>>> of application which mashes up Web and home networked devices.
>>>>
>>>> Actually I have a concern that only service discovery and service
>>>> communication will be discussed at next step due to the priority.  
>>>> Since
>>>> both use cases are similar, I suggest that WG will discuss a technical
>>>> solutions by taking in count of both of requirements in the same
>>>> priority. The approach will avoid the solutions will differ  
>>>> completely.
>>>>
>>>> I have realize that the a set of requirements should be high priority.
>>>>
>>>> #Application
>>>> communication<http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Requirements#Application_communication>,#Application
>>>> Discovery<http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Requirements#Application_Discovery>,
>>>> #Services
>>>> Advertisement<http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Requirements#Services_Advertisement>,
>>>>
>>>> Any question and comment?
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> -***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***--***---***---***-
>>>> Tatsuya
>>>> Igarashi (Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com<mailto:Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com>)
>>>> NS Development Dept. Technology Development Group
>>>> Sony Corporation
>>>> (Voice) +81-3-5435-3252 (Fax) +81-3-5435-3274
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
| Matt Hammond
| Research Engineer, BBC R&D, Centre House, London
| http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/

Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2011 16:38:09 UTC