RE: [HOME_NETWORK_TF] Issue-50 UPnP Reference section

Hello Giuseppe,

Agreed. (It was my own bit of punditry).

Regards,
Russell Berkoff
Samsung

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Giuseppe Pascale [mailto:giuseppep@opera.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 12:31 AM
> To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org; Russell Berkoff
> Subject: Re: [HOME_NETWORK_TF] Issue-50 UPnP Reference section
> 
> Hi Russell,
> I'm checking your submission [1] and I have one comment.
> 
> While I agree that some references may be useful for the reader of our
> document to get links to all useful resources, the "related work"
> section should be as neutral as possible not to give the false
> impression we are endorsing any of these standards. So I think would be
> better to remove this sentence
> 
> "It would be highly desirable if W3C User-Agents supported generic
> access to UPnP devices by providing a secure interface to these devices
> as defined by UPnP Device Architecture.".
> 
> Other than that the section seems to be a useful collection of links so
> I'm fine to add it in the related works section.
> 
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Discussions/UPnP

> Refs
> 
> 
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 05:43:48 +0200, Russell Berkoff
> <r.berkoff@sisa.samsung.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >I submitted a new section describing UPnP and relevant UPnP
> specifications for the HNTF Report.
> >Please see Issue-50 (or the HNTF Wiki discussion section).
> >Regards,
> > Russell Berkoff
> > Samsung Electronics
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Giuseppe Pascale
> TV & Connected Devices
> Opera Software - Sweden