- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 04:57:32 +0900
- To: Russell Berkoff <r.berkoff@sisa.samsung.com>
- CC: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
Hi Russel, I think there are two possible options: option 1: you separate your description into the following two pieces: 1. generic description on the use case itself 2. detail of possible implementations and/or examples like existing starndards, e.g., DLNA/UPnP option 2: you simply make your use case a "specific kind of use case" in our use case document My personal preference is option 1 above :) Russel, Giuseppe and others, what do you think? Thanks, Kazuyuki On 05/25/2011 04:40 AM, Russell Berkoff wrote: > Hello, > On the 5/24 HNTF call it was suggested to remove DLNA/UPnP from a submitted use-case. > I have no particular objections. However, I do have a concern about existing deployed UPnP/DLNA devices that customers would like to have supported. > I would suggest that we include a use-case that directly requires support of existing (and future) UPnP/DLNA devices. > Regards, > Russell Berkoff > Samsung Electronics -- Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Web&TV, MMI and Voice Tel: +81 466 49 1170
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 19:59:14 UTC