- From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:19:02 +0200
- To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org, "Russell Berkoff" <r.berkoff@sisa.samsung.com>, "Matt Hammond" <matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk>
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:14:54 +0200, Matt Hammond <matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote: >> * Standardisation could facilitate a new ecosystem of interfaces. >> * Existing standards for home network communication are not >> available from the browser context >> >> Actually CEA-2014-B has a web-binding for UPnP devices. But the question we are asking ourselves is: is it possible to cover this use case using open web standards? >> PHP has a >> binding for UPnP Devices (GUPnP). A desirable goal of this TF is to have >> W3C also publish these (or similar bindings). > > The intention with this statement was to point to the current lack of > ability to access technologies (such as UPnP) *directly* from within, > for example, a browser running on an iPad, android device, or laptop. I > believe the interests of many in this TF is to plug precisely this gap > for the likes of UPnP. The goal is either to see if there are suitable open standards to reuse or if we need to define something new, as needed. And even though there are some existing standards we may want to support (e.g. UPnP) we should not restrict ourselves to this since there could be several reasons (technical, commercial etc) why one would want to implement the same use case using a different underlying technology. The question for the future WG would then be: can this be achieved with a common approach? This is up for discussion, and we had already a first brainstorming as captured by Clarke in ISSUE-9 http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Discussions/Alternatives That is why I think, once again, we should keep our usecases generic enough. Mentioning UPnP, Bonjour, Bluetooth etc is fine IFF 1)there is a justification for it (X% devices on the market already support this) 2)we don't restrict ourselves to that. This taskforce is not a UPnP TF, so we are not doing a gap analysis of UPnP. /g -- Giuseppe Pascale TV & Connected Devices Opera Software - Sweden
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 10:19:38 UTC