- From: Bob Lund <B.Lund@CableLabs.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:05:29 -0600
- To: Alexander Adolf <alexander.adolf@me.com>, W3C Web+TV IG <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
While DLNA guidelines for the use of UPnP are not free, the underlying UPnP specs are and available here www.upnp.org. Bob Lund > -----Original Message----- > From: public-web-and-tv-request@w3.org [mailto:public-web-and-tv- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Adolf > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 6:12 AM > To: W3C Web+TV IG > Subject: Re: [Fwd: local device discovery - api, demo and source code] > > Dear Colleagues, > > On 2011-04-13, at 15:34 , Dave Raggett wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 15:08 +0200, Jean-Claude Dufourd wrote: > >> On 12/4/11 17:17 , Dave Raggett wrote: > >>> Forwarding at Francois's suggestion. > >>> > >>> (see also the W3C blog entry). > >> > >> JCD: Thank you for the information. This triggers many questions. > >> - in your list of discovery technologies, why no UPnP ? > > > > The discovery protocol for UPnP *is* SSDP, which is covered. It uses a > > combination of a multicast search probe, unicast responses, and > > multicast notifications. > > [...] > > DVB uses UPnP as defined by DLNA. Device discovery is using UPnP DCP and > CDS advertisements. Overview is here: > http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102900_102999/102905/01.01.01_60/ts_ > 102905v010101p.pdf > > Unfortunately the DLNA specs are not available for free, so I can't > provide any. *Very* terse info on discovery here: > http://www.dlna.org/industry/why_dlna/key_components/device_discovery/ > > --alex
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 17:06:05 UTC