- From: FUNAHASHI Yosuke <yfuna@tomo-digi.co.jp>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:57:23 +0900
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>, public-web-and-tv@w3.org
Hi Charles, > Grouping by broadcast standard or country (which is similar in > effect) risks breaking a lot of the discussion into groups who agree > among themselves arguing through representatives against > representatives of other groups, without enough communication > between individuals to overcome the differences. Given the different > standards we have for doing the same things, one of our big problems > is going to be overcoming entrenched positions on particular > technologies. This is delicate and complicated negotiation, and in > my experience pushing groups to entrench their positions internally > and then negotiate through representatives will actually make it > more difficult to achieve the consensus that we need. I agree with you about grouping by broadcast standard or country. What do you think about creating task forces by matter of concern and interest? (as needed) In other words, I would like to discuss, hum... said a certain way, recruiting and human resources management on the IG. (of course, volunteers) I guess the current initial chairs (four!) with Kaz will be sufficient workforce to process the spadework for realizing effective discussions on the IG's ML, if all of the chairs have sufficient dedication and performance. For now, I myself am prepared to work hard at least for six months. But I do not know how much other three chairs are permitted by their organization. I know, to begin with, the spadework is not the chair's work. But with no spadework, we will proceed very slowly. And what I can expect for our workforce now is only those five persons. Because once we let the IG public, the participants is less conscious of the need for their dedication. I now agree with you that the IG should be public, so I would like to build or at least clarify what drive the IG forward. I would like to discuss the possibility for the task forces to be responsible for the preparatory work regarding given topics. Do you think it will work? Regards, Yosuke
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 23:58:25 UTC