- From: FUNAHASHI Yosuke <yfuna@tomo-digi.co.jp>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 01:01:13 +0900
- To: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
Hi Giuseppe, Thank you for your comments on my draft schedule. Actually, I would like to speed-up the process as well.:) The most time-consuming process will be `Review by AC Rep.'. I've heard from Kaz that, theoretically, it can take infinite time if any of AC Reps continue to reject the charter. So we gave the process a month as our target of effort. I would like to ask Kaz about the minimum duration of the process the W3C process document requires. I think it would be the best case we can expect. As for the first half of my draft schedule, I think we had better discuss several topics about the organization of the IG in this period. For example, * the IG should be public or W3C members only? I remember that, in the workshop, someone said that "Interest Group could be public" but the other person said that "Interest Group also requires W3C membership to participate in it". Which is true? If both are true, which is more effective? What do you think? > In any case I think we can start with some preliminary work even > before the charter is finalized so that we are able to start > immediately as the charter is ready. > What do you think? Yes. I agree with you. Regards, Yosuke On 2010/09/22, at 20:06, Giuseppe Pascale wrote: > Hi Yosuke, > I'm also not 100% familiar with W3C process, so I have a question > for you: do we really need 2 months to review and approve the > charter, or can we speed-up the process a little bit. > If this is not possible due to process constraints then I'm fine > with the proposed schedule. > > In any case I think we can start with some preliminary work even > before the charter is finalized so that we are able to start > immediately as the charter is ready. > What do you think? > > Regards, > Giuseppe > > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:52:01 +0200, FUNAHASHI Yosuke <yfuna@tomo-digi.co.jp > > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Thank you very much for your participation in the workshop. >> I, as a member of the program committee, would like to appreciate you >> all for the fruitful discussions at the workshop. >> >> As recorded in the summary [1] and the minutes [2], Masahito Kawamori >> from NTT and myself volunteered to be the co-Chairs for the proposed >> Interest Group to discuss the workshop topics. Also Charles >> McCathieNevile from Opera volunteered to help us generate a draft >> charter, and Kaz Ashimura from W3C helps us as the W3C staff contact. >> >> Charles kindly had already generated an initial draft for the >> proposed >> Interest Group and given it to Masahito and myself. We are no >> reviewing his generated draft, and will soon provide an updated draft >> to you all. >> >> Meanwhile I would propose a possible schedule to finalize the charter >> as below. Unfortunately, I am new in W3C and not 100% sure about the >> W3C Process, but I have checked the W3C Process document and also >> consulted with Kaz before my generating this schedule. So I think >> this should be (somewhat) reasonable. >> >> What do you think? >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/09/web-on-tv/summary.html >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2010/09/web-on-tv/minutes.html >> >> -------- >> * Schedule [Draft] >> >> October 11: >> - Submit the IG charter draft to W3M >> >> October 15: >> - Review by W3M finished >> >> October 16,17: >> - Improve the charter draft according to comments from W3M >> >> October 17 - Nov 17: >> - Review by AC Rep. >> >> Nov 17 - 30?: >> - Improve the charter draft according to comments from AC Rep. >> >> The beginning of Dec: >> - The IG starts >> -------- >> >> Regards, >> Yosuke >> >> > > > -- > Giuseppe Pascale > Linux Devices SDK > Opera Software - Sweden >
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2010 16:01:43 UTC