I see. It seems not easy to define ¡°TV-like devices¡±. Tele-Vision, IP-Vision, etc...ITU-T spent much time for defining IPTV before (almost 6 month or a bit longer). I'm a bit afraid of this point. Personally, I prefer not to include this ambiguoug word as ¡°TV-like devices¡± into the charter. Daniel (from my Galaxy S) 2010. 10. 5. ¿ÀÀü 12:22¿¡ "Giuseppe Pascale" <giuseppep@opera.com>´ÔÀÌ ÀÛ¼º: On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:29:25 +0200, Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/10/4 Pfeffer, He... Hi Daniel, first of all thanks for your interest. About the question "what is a TV", I think one of the goals of this IG (note: not a WG) is exactly to better define which devices should be considered as part of the "TV" experience. So mainly and more naturally TV sets but this doesn't exclude for example companion devices and other devices used in the home environment (and not only). That's why the drafts talks about "TV devices and TV-like devices". A more precise definition and understanding will be hopefully be one of the outcomes of the discussion we will have in the next months. best regards, Giuseppe > Daniel > -- Giuseppe Pascale Linux Devices SDK Opera Software - SwedenReceived on Monday, 4 October 2010 22:34:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:57:02 UTC