W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-and-tv@w3.org > October 2010

Re: IG charter: modification suggestion - Scope & Decision

From: Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 07:33:31 +0900
Message-ID: <AANLkTinPJM8AQtzHmhuhYM+Qbu5Bczo8GJuph5iMpBxS@mail.gmail.com>
To: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
Cc: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>, public-web-and-tv@w3.org, "Pfeffer, Heiko" <heiko.pfeffer@fokus.fraunhofer.de>, 이현재 <hj08.lee@lge.com>, FUNAHASHI Yosuke <yfuna@tomo-digi.co.jp>
I see. It seems not easy to define “TV-like devices”. Tele-Vision,
IP-Vision, etc...ITU-T spent much time for defining IPTV before (almost 6
month or a bit longer). I'm a bit afraid of this point. Personally, I prefer
not to include this ambiguoug word as “TV-like devices” into the charter.

(from my Galaxy S)

2010. 10. 5. 오전 12:22에 "Giuseppe Pascale" <giuseppep@opera.com>님이 작성:

On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:29:25 +0200, Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2010/10/4 Pfeffer, He...
Hi Daniel,
first of all thanks for your interest.

About the question "what is a TV", I think one of the goals of this IG
(note: not a WG) is exactly to better define which devices should be
considered as part of the "TV" experience.
So mainly and more naturally TV sets but this doesn't exclude for example
companion devices and other devices used in the home environment (and not

That's why the drafts talks about "TV devices and TV-like devices". A more
precise definition and understanding will be hopefully be one of the
outcomes of the discussion we will have in the next months.

best regards,

> Daniel

Giuseppe Pascale
Linux Devices SDK
Opera Software - Sweden
Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 22:34:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:57:02 UTC