- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:54:57 +0900
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- CC: FUNAHASHI Yosuke <yfuna@tomo-digi.co.jp>, public-web-and-tv@w3.org
Hi Charles, I completely agree with you :) We don't have to define how to form which task forces in the charter but can form them later once the IG is launched. Also I agree we're getting close to the *doing phase*. Thanks, Kazuyuki On 09/30/2010 09:43 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:57:23 +0200, FUNAHASHI Yosuke > <yfuna@tomo-digi.co.jp> wrote: > > Hi Yosuke, > >> What do you think about creating task forces by matter of concern and >> interest? (as needed) > > I think doing this is essential to make progress. > > The real question is how much we need to formally make a task force, and > how much it is a case of identifying the people who are working on a > particular topic on the home page (so we know who was *meant* to be at > the meetings or sending comments ;) ). > > It isn't an exact science to get volunteers to do spadework. If a task > force is run wholly as part of the IG, I believe we can create them > without having it in the charter - the requirement is to set ourselves a > task, and name ourselves as the people responsible for it, then do it. > >> In other words, I would like to discuss, hum... said a certain way, >> recruiting and human resources management on the IG. (of course, >> volunteers) ... But with no spadework, we will proceed very slowly. >> ... I would like to discuss the possibility for the task forces to be >> responsible for the preparatory work regarding given topics. Do you >> think it will work? > > There's a delicate balance between having lots of process (which can end > up meaning people who are not named contribute less than they might > because they think it is someone else's job) and not enough clarity > (which means they contribute less than they might because they are not > sure when and how they should be getting involved. > > I think that managing this is really what the chairs and staff contact > do in the way that they run the group, interact with participants, and > publish information on the home page. If there were something magic I > knew of to add to the charter to help, I would propose it, but in my > experience it is more a matter of people working hard and efficiently, > and I don't know of any wording that makes that happen for a group like > this. Of course, if you have anything that you think can help, please > propose it. > > Actually I think we are nearing the limits of what we can do by editing > the charter. This is good - it means we are getting ready to start the > *doing* phase (after charter review ...) > > cheers > > Chaals > -- Kazuyuki Ashimura / W3C Multimodal & Voice Activity Lead mailto: ashimura@w3.org voice: +81.466.49.1170 / fax: +81.466.49.1171
Received on Friday, 1 October 2010 10:56:02 UTC