- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 12:40:35 -0500
- To: James Rosewell <james@51degrees.com>, Nick Doty <ndoty@cdt.org>, "public-web-adv@w3.org" <public-web-adv@w3.org>
- Cc: Katherine Wei <kwei@zetaglobal.com>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Kris Chapman <kristen.chapman@salesforce.com>, Sam Goto <goto@google.com>, Beri Lee <berilee@google.com>, dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>, Heather Flanagan <hlf@sphericalcowconsulting.com>, Tim Cappalli <Tim.Cappalli@microsoft.com>
On 2022-02-04 10:40, James Rosewell wrote: > One consequence of work to reduce data sharing between different > internet domains, such as Privacy Sandbox or GPC, is to significantly > increase the value of directly identifiable personal data such as email > addresses and telephone numbers. I am very reluctantly stepping in here as editor of the GPC specification to correct this piece of disinformation. While everyone can make honest mistakes, when someone speaks confidently and assertively in public, it is tempting to assume that they at least understand the topic well enough to get the more elementary facts right. That is not the case here. GPC does not "reduce data sharing between different internet domains." Where enforceable, GPC only impinges upon the right of service providers to reuse data independently of a business or person. Crucially, GPC applies in the exact same way to personal data shared using cookie IDs, email addresses, phone numbers, or whatever else one may cook up. Please note that I am only providing a fact check on the GPC part of that email, and not implying by omission that its non-GPC parts are in any way more truthful. -- Robin Berjon VP Data Governance The New York Times Company
Received on Friday, 4 February 2022 17:40:52 UTC