W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag3-protocols@w3.org > May 2022

RE: Possible protocols example?

From: Jaunita George <jaunita_george@navyfederal.org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 14:07:21 +0000
To: Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>, Jennifer Strickland <jstrickland@mitre.org>, "public-wcag3-protocols@w3.org" <public-wcag3-protocols@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CY4PR06MB3222F0701545F8428E1B96FDFDC69@CY4PR06MB3222.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
+1 to Bruce. 😊

Jaunita George, JD, PMP, WAS (she/her)
QA-ADA Analyst III, Product Engineering & Delivery Services (ISD)
DHS Certified Trusted Tester (TTV5)
[IAAP WAS circular badge and horizontal name logo for International Association of Accessibility Professionals (IAAP) Web Accessibility Specialist (WAS) credential. To the left is a dark blue circle with three lines of centered white text that read: IAAP Certified WAS. There is a smaller light blue circle that surrounds the dark blue inner circle that designates the WAS credential color scheme. To the right, two lines of dark blue text. Top text reads Web Accessibility Specialist, second line reads International Association of Accessibility Professionals.]<https://www.accessibilityassociation.org/s/wascertification>
Navy Federal Credit Union, 820 Follin Lane, Vienna VA 22180
w 571-391-0356 • c 571-422-2661 • nfcu.webex.com/meet/jaunita_george
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/navyfederal> | Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/navyfederal> | YouTube<http://www.youtube.com/user/navyfederal> | Instagram<http://instagram.com/navyfederal> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/11568?trk=tyah>

[Navy Federal Credit Union: Our members are the mission.]    [Digital A11ies -- Working Together for All]

[Fortune 100 Best Companies to Work for 2022]
©2022 Fortune Media IP Limited. Used under license.

From: Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 2:09 PM
To: Jennifer Strickland <jstrickland@mitre.org>; public-wcag3-protocols@w3.org
Subject: [External] RE: Possible protocols example?

Thanks Jennifer for suggesting this possible protocols example.  Today we took a look during the Evaluations Procedure breakout group.  That resource at that URL seems a little too simplest as an evaluation protocol

The only “evaluation procedure” example we have so far is:
This one is great, but also probably too ambitious to be frequently replicated.

My own sense is that we are looking for model evaluation procedures to follow that are larger than a single 2.x SC but not too broad either.  It also may be the case that the group ends up writing a few.

From: Jennifer Strickland <jstrickland@mitre.org<mailto:jstrickland@mitre.org>>
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 10:38 AM
To: public-wcag3-protocols@w3.org<mailto:public-wcag3-protocols@w3.org>
Subject: Possible protocols example?

Hi Protocols folks,

While researching something I thought to look up what California’s accessibility standards are since I recall they’re more stringent than Section 508. The way the state of California documented their efforts might be a good example of how folks might document their protocols efforts: https://www.ca.gov/accessibility/<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1DzyKQz5dnt1PaM-JfUzQzRtgleAS2CL7Wy5Q8h5ZyFjnaNch_av6YtNBIMqVmcWYSslEZRNWK0NBn6fc9mKJBKGJOnyUR41PdZpY8ozjmuBxuWOak8e0xZaYyl1_fv-9Gqnei2rajJSQJ2UrCAWRTcmZ7w1waywBP8wCD2VdmNuGLLPIh7eIFc1KdvKAIYvDPBnUPcprbyftbPKoPe2Om0i0oM16vFjWqbfDQTW5HjSrXOtiL7Ocvvdb9Et9JRo1_v6FN3ykBszRR5iMhyuxtMQb2VW-EbD7fT2yRnyGLtA1-xiqNIuw2xIWyXWc5qoBBdqVOK3zYlNuiKcnu9hXUYHY2wDxksHKNqi_B1NzTrIE7cF1m5gq_-Tr25QkC9iAlg_oTf80kNL5VEpcFuVTHaSB7WUgblJ6bHSCVjMaz1OUNvvTH06I_uAj2BvjFqHbq9R55uzE0OLFA1jqukaMWg/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca.gov%2Faccessibility%2F>


Jennifer Strickland (they/them, she/her)
Senior Human Centered Accessibility Engineer
Collaboration and Social Computing (L178)
Email: jstrickland@mitre.org<mailto:jstrickland@mitre.org>
Cell: 571-319-2230
[Linkedin, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook and Instagram logos]


(image/png attachment: image004.png)

(image/png attachment: image005.png)

(image/png attachment: image006.png)

(image/png attachment: image007.png)

(image/png attachment: image008.png)

(image/jpeg attachment: image001.jpg)

Received on Monday, 9 May 2022 14:07:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 9 May 2022 14:07:44 UTC