Re: Evaluating procedures proposal and examples

On 28/07/2022 3:03 p.m., Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael wrote:
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> I believe this replaces section 4.1.4. If you agree, can we remove 
> 4.1.4 Procedural tests and any related text from the PR?
>
What I did was reference the new section from 4.1.4 Procedural tests. 
Given the testing sections are brief, and I was adding a lot of content, 
I thought this would keep the readability of the testing section while 
expanding on the implementation procedures to the full amount needed.

Michael

> Kind regards,
>
> Rachael
>
> *From: *Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:57 AM
> *To: *"public-wcag3-protocols@w3.org" <public-wcag3-protocols@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Evaluating procedures proposal and examples
> *Resent-From: *<public-wcag3-protocols@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:56 AM
>
> I've been working on the evaluating procedures proposal write-up that 
> we discussed last week, and on a few examples. The content is very 
> rough, but I think shows the general shape. I believe this will be on 
> survey for the AG next week, but I'd like to continue to improve it if 
> we can. This is all reflected in pull 653 
> <https://github.com/w3c/silver/pull/653> which includes in particular:
>
>   * A new section on outcome implementation procedures
>     <https://raw.githack.com/w3c/silver/evaluating-procedures-proposal/guidelines/index.html#outcome-implementation-procedures>
>
>   * Example 1: Provide help and support (small orgs)
>     <https://raw.githack.com/w3c/silver/evaluating-procedures-proposal/examples/outcome-implementation-procedures/example1.html>
>
>   * Example 2: Provide help and support (large orgs)
>     <https://raw.githack.com/w3c/silver/evaluating-procedures-proposal/examples/outcome-implementation-procedures/example2.html>
>
>   * Example 3: Plain language
>     <https://raw.githack.com/w3c/silver/evaluating-procedures-proposal/examples/outcome-implementation-procedures/example3.html>
>
>   * Example 4: Omnibus procedure for multiple outcomes
>     <https://raw.githack.com/w3c/silver/evaluating-procedures-proposal/examples/outcome-implementation-procedures/example4.html>
>
>
> The content of these examples is very rough and incomplete. I think 
> the overall structure proposed works, but the real differentiation 
> between examples is in the steps and evaluation procedures. I find 
> that details of those goes outside my expertise. I put in "hand-wavey" 
> content to suggest the general direction, but I think the examples 
> would be much more convincing if that content could be improved. So 
> please review the content in that context, but also suggest tangible 
> improvements by email or additions to the pull request if you can.
>
> Michael
>