- From: Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:27:24 +0000
- To: "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <MW5PR22MB35112E46AF2351ADEFE1DB02E32D2@MW5PR22MB3511.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
One action item from Thursday call is that I volunteered to do an editorial pass for our use of "requires" and suggest different phrasing when "requires" is noting a prerequisite/assumption (for/of the SC) versus when "requires" is used for paraphrasing the normative meaning of the SC. During the meeting, Gregg shared a word search of the current editor's draft: > GreggVan: I did a "requires" pass to the listserv I could not find it, so I followed up with Gregg off list. Please find attached and linked from the listserv archive. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag2ict-tf/2024Mar/ Thanks, Bruce From: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2024 11:57 AM To: public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org Subject: [WCAG2ICT] Meeting minutes for the 14 March meeting Hi all, Here’s a link to today’s minutes: https://www.w3.org/2024/03/14-wcag2ict-minutes.html In tomorrow’s extra Friday meeting we’ll continue discussions of the survey results starting with question 3 onward to see if any changes are needed in the text. Best regards, Mary Jo Mueller IBM Accessibility Standards Program Manager
Attachments
- application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document attachment: Requires - search.docx
Received on Monday, 18 March 2024 13:27:34 UTC