- From: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:33:05 +0000
- To: "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DM6PR15MB31640E68D735FFF905796FD7940D2@DM6PR15MB3164.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Hi all, Today’s extra Friday meeting was cancelled due to lack of participation. As a result, I am working to ensure the remainder of the issues are answered. As of this time the publication of the next WCAG2ICT draft is at risk of missing a May timeframe and any help you can provide is quite welcome. Here are links to these items that are in-progress drafts. If you can, please quickly review and provide suggested edits that can go to survey. Otherwise, these will be surveyed in the exact state they are in. * Issue 145 Google doc<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XBgjeXvjB72p3OQogJtDUuWpzZcW-OWqxCixz3-jWz4/edit#heading=h.fc1hsp2pxmby> (incorporating comments from the survey results<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/WCAG2ICT-survey-comment-answers/results>) * Issues related to 1.4.10 Reflow in the google doc (221<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbtNcNjrpog8-6OYloMcPILh2UsqUOXBjPwVwv7dPsw/edit#heading=h.ezygzxmjhrno>, 226<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbtNcNjrpog8-6OYloMcPILh2UsqUOXBjPwVwv7dPsw/edit#heading=h.a1qg03zaygi6>, and 257<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbtNcNjrpog8-6OYloMcPILh2UsqUOXBjPwVwv7dPsw/edit#heading=h.g1tfkw9rkm6f>) * Potential update to SC problematic for Closed Functionality regarding 1.4.10 Reflow<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbtNcNjrpog8-6OYloMcPILh2UsqUOXBjPwVwv7dPsw/edit#heading=h.ynsr98668tn5> Assistance needed on outstanding work. If you can help with any of these items, please let me know: * Develop a response for Issue 4 and to determine if any additional notes are needed to address this public comment. I created Issue 4 Google doc<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p5EX9d5Q9L1CghcECjPMVqIBxg4UJUZ5U3A3EZhNxUQ/edit> to do this work. * Editor’s notes - If there are specific items that we need to call attention to, please add them to the list in the Google Doc on editor’s notes<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mMwT32Glnqc_GKyTyW3AIMXOw9Aiho7wEXBdfC7v9gc/edit?usp=sharing>. * Review of the editor’s draft as a whole to approve to send to the AG WG. Best regards, Mary Jo Mueller IBM Accessibility Standards Program Manager
Received on Friday, 19 April 2024 17:33:12 UTC